National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XIAO Ruien | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 2 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% |
| 3 | LUO Ashley | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
| 3 | XUAN Nicole J. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 40% | 23% |
| 5 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 45% | 41% |
| 6 | TAYLOR Kiera S. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
| 7 | REID Anousheh | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 9 | JAKEL Sophia N. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 66% |
| 10 | ALEXANDROV Katherine S. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 11 | KIM Zoe L. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% |
| 12 | REMEZA Alissa | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 13 | LEACH Meka A. | - | - | 3% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 15 | MUELLER Emma M. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 16 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
| 17 | YU Bailey | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 18 | LI Bingqi | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 2% |
| 19 | YIN Julia | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 16% |
| 20 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 36% | 8% |
| 21 | LEE Yedda | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
| 22 | KEE Bea Isabelle | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 23 | ZHENG Linden | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 24 | FURMAN Maria | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 25 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 26 | LEE Olivia | 11% | 35% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 27 | LI Suri | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% | |
| 28 | LU Samantha R. | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 30 | AZMEH nour | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 31 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 15% |
| 33 | YOU Isabel B. | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 34 | NGUYEN Kira | 1% | 16% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 36 | WITTER Catherine A. | 2% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 37 | HU Chelsea | 7% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 38 | HAFEEZ Hania | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 39 | ZHU Serene M. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 40 | NIKOLIC DE JACINTO Alix P. | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 41 | BEEM Marin | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 42 | YANG Alisa | 25% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | NIEMAN Aubrey | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 44 | TAYLOR Kylin | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 45 | KIM Angelina | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 46 | JAKEL Alysa C. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 46 | CHAWLA Aanya | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 48 | PEELER Julia | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 49 | SMITH Meghan | 2% | 19% | 43% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 50 | WONG Bella | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 51 | YOU Emily | 9% | 54% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 52 | MACEY Hadley | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 53 | BECKMAN Ana | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | LIU Nicole | 25% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | QIU Emily | 24% | 40% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.