National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XIAO Ruien | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 5% |
| 2 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% |
| 3 | LUO Ashley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
| 3 | XUAN Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 23% |
| 5 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 41% |
| 6 | TAYLOR Kiera S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
| 7 | REID Anousheh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 9 | JAKEL Sophia N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% |
| 10 | ALEXANDROV Katherine S. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
| 11 | KIM Zoe L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% |
| 12 | REMEZA Alissa | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 13 | LEACH Meka A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
| 15 | MUELLER Emma M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 16 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 17 | YU Bailey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 18 | LI Bingqi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 21% | 2% |
| 19 | YIN Julia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 16% |
| 20 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 8% |
| 21 | LEE Yedda | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% | |
| 22 | KEE Bea Isabelle | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 23 | ZHENG Linden | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 24 | FURMAN Maria | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 25 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 26 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 89% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 27 | LI Suri | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% | |
| 28 | LU Samantha R. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 29 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 30 | AZMEH nour | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 31 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 15% |
| 33 | YOU Isabel B. | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 34 | NGUYEN Kira | 100% | 99% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 36 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 37 | HU Chelsea | 100% | 93% | 66% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 38 | HAFEEZ Hania | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 39 | ZHU Serene M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 40 | NIKOLIC DE JACINTO Alix P. | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 41 | BEEM Marin | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 42 | YANG Alisa | 100% | 75% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | NIEMAN Aubrey | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 44 | TAYLOR Kylin | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 45 | KIM Angelina | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 46 | JAKEL Alysa C. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | - |
| 46 | CHAWLA Aanya | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 48 | PEELER Julia | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 49 | SMITH Meghan | 100% | 98% | 79% | 36% | 6% | - | - |
| 50 | WONG Bella | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 51 | YOU Emily | 100% | 91% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 52 | MACEY Hadley | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 53 | BECKMAN Ana | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | LIU Nicole | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | QIU Emily | 100% | 76% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.