San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KANDL-ZHANG Lea | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | |
2 | VO Bao-Vy | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 7% | |
3 | NAIR Supriya | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% | |
3 | LIU Emma | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
5 | BOLES Amanda X. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
6 | SAVVICH Ekaterina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 7% |
7 | MANN Sophia J. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
8 | PENG Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% | |
9 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 23% | 4% | < 1% |
10 | KIM Rachel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 26% | |
11 | WANG Zoie Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% |
12 | HOVAGHIMIAN Fira | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 23% | |
13 | XU Audrey J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 5% | |
14 | LENK Sophie | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
15 | GILLIS-PADE Neallie | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% | |
16 | OH Ceana | 100% | 93% | 64% | 23% | 2% | - | |
17 | HO Addison | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
18 | CHU Camille | 100% | 96% | 74% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
19 | KHAIRUL ANWAR Rania Zara | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
20 | CUI Alivia | 100% | 74% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
21 | MORRIS-WEIDE Ella | 100% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
22 | LEE Roselyn | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
23 | REN Kayley | 100% | 71% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
25 | THERON Zoe | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.