San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KANDL-ZHANG Lea | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% | |
| 2 | VO Bao-Vy | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 7% | |
| 3 | NAIR Supriya | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 12% | |
| 3 | LIU Emma | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 5 | BOLES Amanda X. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 6 | SAVVICH Ekaterina | - | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 44% | 7% |
| 7 | MANN Sophia J. | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 8 | PENG Charlotte | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
| 9 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 1% | 7% | 28% | 41% | 20% | 3% | < 1% |
| 10 | KIM Rachel | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% | |
| 11 | WANG Zoie Z. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 67% |
| 12 | HOVAGHIMIAN Fira | - | - | 5% | 26% | 45% | 23% | |
| 13 | XU Audrey J. | - | 4% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 5% | |
| 14 | LENK Sophie | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 15 | GILLIS-PADE Neallie | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
| 16 | OH Ceana | 7% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | HO Addison | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 18 | CHU Camille | 4% | 22% | 41% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 19 | KHAIRUL ANWAR Rania Zara | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 20 | CUI Alivia | 26% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 21 | MORRIS-WEIDE Ella | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 22 | LEE Roselyn | 38% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 23 | REN Kayley | 29% | 49% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 25 | THERON Zoe | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.