Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DOELL Ethan | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
| 2 | SHENG Dalton | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% |
| 3 | CHEN Kyle P. | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% |
| 3 | LI Edison M. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 8% |
| 5 | CHO Jadon Yushin | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% | |
| 6 | SALEH Omar | - | - | - | 4% | 25% | 56% | 15% |
| 7 | GUTH Joseph | - | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% |
| 8 | SIMONOV Timofey | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 60% |
| 9 | TANG Alexander L. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 28% | 70% |
| 10 | WONG Evan | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% | |
| 11 | TOOMRE Kai | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
| 12 | CHA James | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 45% | 11% | |
| 13 | LIU Alex | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 22% | 4% | |
| 14 | SHIN Noah | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 12% | |
| 15 | ELKOUSY Zain al Din | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 60% | |
| 16 | YU William | - | 1% | 12% | 39% | 42% | 6% | |
| 17 | FANG Haoyu | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 18 | ONIK Ari N. | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
| 19 | SUAREZ David | - | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 29% | 4% |
| 20 | BAI Austin | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 19% | 2% |
| 21 | KINGSLEY Griffin | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 37% | 8% | - |
| 22 | HUA Aaron | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 32% | 6% |
| 23 | COSSROW Alex | 2% | 14% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 24 | METZ Mason | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 38% | 10% | |
| 25 | HUYNH Matthew | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 19% | 1% | |
| 26 | JIANG Bohan | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | TARCHICHI Robby | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 28 | SUSANTO William | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 29 | SENANI Arjun | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 3% |
| 30 | LU Andy | - | 1% | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% | |
| 31 | MARISI Gabriel | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 2% |
| 32 | GRIGORIEV Michael | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
| 33 | VADEN Oliver | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 36% | |
| 34 | GE Felix Fei | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% | |
| 35 | LIM EUNSEONG | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 36 | REN Ryan | 5% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | JIN Daniel | 1% | 12% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 38 | LEONG Samuel | 9% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | JIN George | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 40 | HE Ryan | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 41 | SAMUEL Lucas | 1% | 9% | 32% | 40% | 16% | 2% | |
| 42 | CHOW Kingsley | 3% | 34% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | XU Joseph | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 44 | BAS Jonathan | 32% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 45 | BABER Shaheer | 34% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 46 | CHIANG Aiden | 18% | 43% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | BOWLES Kevin | 1% | 14% | 40% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 48 | ADAN Jacobo | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 49 | SIMANDJUNTAK Joshua | 43% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 50 | KAYE Ben | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | CHANG Parker | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% | |
| 52 | PARMAR Veer | 18% | 44% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 53 | PHILLIPS Oliver | 25% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | TUCKER Nechiga | 9% | 33% | 40% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 55 | BLACK Henry | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 56 | STANSBURY Desmond | 8% | 32% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | JIN Xinyi | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 58 | SHAW Spencer | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 59 | RAMESH Prashvin | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | KIM Daniel | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 61 | KUBBA Krish | 22% | 46% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | CHOI Hunter | 21% | 43% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | ZENG Albert | 14% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | SHAW eric | 26% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 65 | WEBER Andrew | - | 9% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 66 | CAO Joshua | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 67 | LEE Noah | 10% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 68 | HAN Nathan | 37% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 68 | XU Ryan | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 70 | MACK Ethan | 4% | 23% | 43% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 71 | NEGLEY Royce | 17% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 72 | CHEN Tyler | 81% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.