Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MUNLIN Donovan | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | |
| 2 | LEE Andrew O. | - | - | - | 6% | 37% | 56% | |
| 3 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 16% | |
| 3 | DEMPSEY Connor | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 9% | |
| 5 | LUEDECKE Myles A. | - | 1% | 7% | 20% | 33% | 29% | 10% |
| 6 | DONDISCH ilan | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 7 | GONZALES Wesley | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 6% | |
| 8 | HSU Joshua | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 9 | YAMASAKI Kyle A. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% |
| 10 | LU Jacob | 1% | 8% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
| 11 | WEGENER Soren | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
| 12 | LEE Jake (JiYuen) | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 13 | DESSAUER Tobyn M. | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 38% | 11% | |
| 13 | WAI Andreas | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 15 | FRANK Fred | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% | |
| 16 | LEE Tobias (Toby) T. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% | |
| 17 | KILUK Andrew | - | - | 6% | 29% | 49% | 16% | |
| 18 | HAMZA Tudor | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 13% | |
| 19 | WELDON Benjamin | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 46% | 16% |
| 20 | PETERSEN Ephraim | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% | 1% |
| 21 | VARNEY John R. | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 16% | |
| 22 | SWANSON Carl G. | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% | |
| 23 | MATHES Caleb | 1% | 11% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 2% | |
| 24 | KWON Andrew | 5% | 27% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | MCNAMARA Scott | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
| 26 | TOYOFUKU Ethan | 10% | 46% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | HANNON Owen | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 28 | GOWDA Suyog | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | ZANKOWSKI Brendan | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | NEICE William | 5% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 31 | OLSON Kevin | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | JAN Timothy | < 1% | 5% | 26% | 47% | 19% | 2% | |
| 33 | SIM Ian | 4% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 34 | CHENG Trevor | 18% | 46% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
| 35 | BENTLEY-INOUYE Evan | 1% | 6% | 18% | 31% | 28% | 14% | 3% |
| 36 | LI Timothy | 40% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 37 | COHEN Joshua | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | VAN Tyson | 6% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | KING Richard (Dick) M. | 2% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 40 | MEHROTRA Dhruv | 62% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 41 | ELLINGTON Jeff B. | 4% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 42 | MCINTOSH Caleb D. | 6% | 36% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 42 | ST CLAIR Soren | 66% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 42 | CHAKRABORTY Zorian | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.