Prime Fencing Academy - Dublin, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DOLZHENKO Bogdan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 54% |
| 2 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 53% |
| 3 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 10% |
| 3 | BILKO ILLIA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 9% |
| 5 | SOHN Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 80% |
| 6 | GUAN Adeline | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 7 | TSANG Matthew K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 73% | 20% |
| 8 | WENDLER Alexander J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 39% | 1% |
| 9 | WONG Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 16% | 1% |
| 10 | BERMAN Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 39% | 1% |
| 11 | LO Ernest | 100% | 89% | 52% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 12 | DOUGLASS Liam | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 13 | DESAI Nalin H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 80% | 13% |
| 14 | BURLINGAME Owen | 100% | 87% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 15 | BURAGOHAIN Aiden | 100% | 92% | 58% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 16 | FARIONOV DMYTRO | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 8% | - |
| 17 | PEGRAM Rafferty G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 67% | 16% |
| 18 | WEI Winston | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% | 9% | - | - |
| 19 | SAFTA Aidan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 20 | VAN SCOYK Aeron I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 12% | 1% |
| 21 | WILLIAMS Matthew | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 16% | - | - |
| 22 | AGARWAL Savya | 100% | 96% | 74% | 31% | 3% | - | - |
| 23 | BEOHAR Anika | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 24 | ZHU Yunyao | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 25 | BHATT Morgane | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 5% |
| 26 | MASOOD Rohail | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 6% | - | - |
| 27 | BHATT Jay | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 28 | LAVERY Lucy | 100% | 78% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | CHENG Norman | 100% | 95% | 71% | 28% | 3% | - | - |
| 30 | HERNANDEZ Jonathan | 100% | 73% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 31 | JUNG Aaron | 100% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 32 | CHUI Karisa | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | VOROBIEV Alexandra | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 34 | CHENG Maxwell | 100% | 84% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | YUEN Landon | 100% | 88% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.