Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | CHEN Kyle P. | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
2 | PARRISH Evan | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
3 | TANG Alexander L. | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 5.8 | 5 | -0.8 |
3 | LU Andy | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
5 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
6 | HUA Aaron | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
6 | ELKOUSY Zain al Din | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
8 | SIMONOV Timofey | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
9 | GE Felix Fei | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
10 | SHENG Dalton | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
11 | HUYNH Matthew | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
12 | PAN Ethan | V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
13 | MARISI Gabriel | V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
14 | LI Edison M. | V V V V V D | V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
15 | LIM EUNSEONG | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
16 | YU William | D V V D D V | V V V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
17 | ZHAO Ryan | V V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
18 | CHANG Parker | V V D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
19 | DOELL Ethan | V V V V D V | V D | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
20 | TOOMRE Kai | D D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
21 | ZHAO Nathan | V V V D D V | V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
22 | JIN Daniel | V D D V V V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
23 | JIN Xinyi | V V V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
24 | YOON Byungheon | V D V D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
25 | KINGSLEY Griffin | V D V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
26 | TARCHICHI Robby | D V V D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
27 | SAMUEL Lucas | V V V D V D | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
28 | ZHAI Alex | V V V D V D | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
29 | CHOI Hunter | D V V V V D | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
30 | FANG Haoyu | D V D V V | V V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
31 | CHIANG Aiden | V D V V D | V V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
32 | BAI Austin | D D V V D V | V V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
33 | ONIK Ari N. | D V V V V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
34 | ZHAI Derrick | D V V V V V | D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
35 | JIANG Bohan | V D V V V V | D | 2.3 | 5 | +2.7 |
36 | CHEN Owen | V V D V V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
37 | ZENG Albert | V V D D V V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
38 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | D V V V V D | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
39 | LEONG Samuel | V V V V D D | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
40 | GRIGORIEV Michael | V D V V V D | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
41 | XU Ryan | D V D V V V | D | 1.3 | 4 | +2.7 |
42 | CHEN Ethan | D V V D V V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
43 | REN Ryan | V V D V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
44 | DANTON Ryan | D V V D V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
45 | JIN George | D V V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
46 | SUSANTO William | V D V V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
47 | SALEH Ali | V D D D V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
48 | SIU Max | V V D V D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
49 | VENAFRO Tristan | V D D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
50 | SHAW Eric | V D D V D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
51 | CAO Joshua | V D V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
52 | BAS Jonathan | V D D V D V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
53 | WEBER Andrew | V D D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
54 | XIE Jayden | D V D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
55 | KIM Daniel | D D V D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
56 | SONG Enoch | D V V D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
57 | BOWLES Kevin | V D D D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
58 | STANSBURY Desmond | D V D D D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
59 | SUAREZ David | V D D V D D | V D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
59 | HE Ryan | D D D V V D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
59 | WANG Caleb | D V V D D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
62 | CHOW Kingsley | D D D V V D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
63 | MORALES Tycho | V D D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
64 | KAYE Ben | D D V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
65 | PARMAR Veer | D D V D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
66 | HUYNH Kaleb | D V D D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
67 | KIAYIAS Alexander | V D D D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
68 | LI Andrew | D D D V V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
69 | QIAN Henry | V D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
70 | HUANG Anthony | V D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
71 | MACK Ethan | D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
72 | KIAYIAS Anthony | D V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
73 | SHAW Spencer | D D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
74 | NEGLEY Royce | V D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
75 | JORGE Elijah | D D V D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
76 | BLACK Henry | D D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
77 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | D V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
78 | MONDESIR Chace | D V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
79 | KUBBA Krish | D D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
80 | WANG Jaaziel | D D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
81 | TUCKER Nechiga | V D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
82 | RAMESH Prashvin | V D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
83 | LEE Noah | D D D D D V | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
84 | PACK Lindsey | D D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
85 | BABER Shaheer | D D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
86 | SUN Andrew | D D D D V D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
87 | LIN Oliver | D D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
88 | XIANG Wangzhi | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
89 | HAN Nathan | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
90 | KAZAKEVICH Kanstantsin | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
91 | SHEN Lucas | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
92 | HOARE Gabriel | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
93 | NANAYAKKARA Dinuth | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
93 | CHEN Timothy | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
95 | LEUNG Ezra | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
96 | CHEN Tyler | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.