Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WAT Chok Weng | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 2 | HANKINS Morgan | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 3 | KIM Zoe L. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 3 | ELSTON Sophia | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 5 | WANG Ziqi (yoyo) | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% |
| 6 | CARRIER Meredith | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
| 7 | SUN Hanya | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 16% | |
| 8 | CHUNG Penelope | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 9 | WU Jessica | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
| 10 | HABEK Sophia | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 10% |
| 11 | LIN Ariel | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 35% | 5% |
| 12 | MARTYNOVA Diana | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% | |
| 13 | HUANG Lanlan | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 5% |
| 14 | LEE Olivia | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
| 15 | WANG Jessie | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | CAMAMA Tessa | - | - | 5% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 6% |
| 17 | LEE Camilla | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 28% |
| 18 | MANDAP Svetlanna | - | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 7% |
| 19 | GUESNARD Maelig | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 20 | SHELIN Chelsea | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 21 | BUSH emma | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
| 22 | BURICEA Ada | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 23 | LI Yunxuan (Joy) | 2% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 24 | WANG Victoria | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% | |
| 25 | LIN Isabel | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 26 | WONG Sydney | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 27 | BAUTISTA DE ROBLES Ekaterine | 1% | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 28 | BLANCO Ariia | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 29 | GAGARING Genia | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 30 | MENDOZA zoie | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
| 31 | HAN Sydney | 12% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | ZHUANG Lauren | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 33 | GIERAT-KATZ Izabella | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 34 | FU Shannon | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 35 | HE Anna | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 36 | DALEY Keira | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% |
| 36 | KANE Chloe | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 38 | KUKVA Taisiya | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 10% |
| 39 | ZHAO Emma | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 40 | LEE Yeriel | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 41 | YUEN Elsie | 12% | 36% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | ZHU Riley | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 43 | WANG Olivia | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | HERD Angela | 1% | 9% | 32% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 45 | PACHECO Carys | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 46 | SCHULTZ Nomi | 2% | 15% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
| 47 | BUCA Nora | 10% | 38% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | RADOV Una | 24% | 43% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | WANG Lihong | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 50 | GAN Shelby | 1% | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 51 | LEE Adelynn | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 52 | LIANG Jingjing | - | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 24% | 3% |
| 52 | MOHAN Riya | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 54 | SCHOR Elisabeth | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 55 | HAN Yuchen | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 5% |
| 56 | DYMAR Anna | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 57 | KUTSY Olga | 3% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 58 | SHETTY Nandita | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | DRYSDALE Lita | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 60 | ZU Jacqueline | 47% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 61 | MOHEBI Neeka | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 62 | TIEN Shaylin | 14% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 63 | WANG Chantal | 3% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 64 | CHIOU-WILLIAMS Matea | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 65 | STOMMEL-DIAZ Charly | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 66 | MANDAP Alessandra | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 67 | MAENG Gloria | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 68 | SCANLAN Alina Nev | 29% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 69 | THOMAS Mackenzie | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 70 | LUCENA Yaretzi | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 71 | LEE Alyssa | 49% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 72 | GRAZIANO Ruby Mae | 6% | 35% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 73 | CIOBANU Alexia | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | TAMIR Annika | 26% | 44% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 75 | GROSSMAN Piper | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.