South Hackensack, NJ - South Hackensack, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CHENG Kyle | V D V D V V | V V V V V | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 2 | DENG Andrew | V D V D V V | V V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 3 | SHOMAN Zachary | V V V V D D | V V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 3 | GILSON Lucas B. | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 5 | HUANG Maxwell H. | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 6 | SHOMAN Noah | D D V D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 7 | KIM Matthew | V V D D D V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 8 | SPRINGER Patrick | D D D V D D | V V V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 9 | HONG Vincent Q. | V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 10 | SHTEYN Mark | V V V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 11 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 12 | GU Kevin | V V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 13 | RAUSCHER Ryan | V V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 14 | LAU Justin Y. | V V D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 15 | PENG Bryan | D D V D V D | V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 16 | DOWNEY Baran | D V D D D D | V V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 17 | COLE Alexander | V V V V V V | D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 18 | MYLEK Peter | V V V V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 19 | HUANG Ethan F. | V V V V V D | D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 20 | OVERDECK Andrew | D V V V V D | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 21 | CHENG Cody | D V V V D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 22 | TANG Charles | D V V V V D | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 23 | CHANG Yufeng | V D V D V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 24 | DOLAN Charles R. | D D D V V V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 25 | MOULTON Ian | D D D V V V | D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
| 26 | FIELDS Matthew S. | D V D V D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 27 | LIN Stephen | V D V D D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 28 | ALTIRS Giorgio | V V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 29 | CHEN Evan P. | D D V D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 30 | SHI Erick | D V D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 31 | LEMPERT Adam | V D D D V D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 32 | ZHUANG Rayken | D D D V D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 33 | SHINCHUK Daniel | D D D D D V | D | 3.9 | 1 | -2.9 |
| 34 | GAJDA Jesse | D D D D V D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 35 | CHENG Hong | D D V D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 36 | CHANG Yuyang | V D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 37 | WRUBEL Natan G. | D V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 38 | WANG Oscar | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 39 | SEN David | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 40 | PILAT Matthew J. | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.