South Hackensack, NJ - South Hackensack, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHENG Kyle | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
2 | DENG Andrew | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
3 | SHOMAN Zachary | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 31% |
3 | GILSON Lucas B. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 41% | 22% | |
5 | HUANG Maxwell H. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 45% | 16% |
6 | SHOMAN Noah | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
7 | KIM Matthew | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
8 | SPRINGER Patrick | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
9 | HONG Vincent Q. | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
10 | SHTEYN Mark | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
11 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
12 | GU Kevin | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
13 | RAUSCHER Ryan | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
14 | LAU Justin Y. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
15 | PENG Bryan | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
16 | DOWNEY Baran | 1% | 14% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
17 | COLE Alexander | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% |
18 | MYLEK Peter | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 42% | 20% | |
19 | HUANG Ethan F. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% |
20 | OVERDECK Andrew | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
21 | CHENG Cody | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 14% | 2% |
22 | TANG Charles | 3% | 22% | 42% | 26% | 6% | - | - |
23 | CHANG Yufeng | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
24 | DOLAN Charles R. | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
25 | MOULTON Ian | 31% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
26 | FIELDS Matthew S. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
27 | LIN Stephen | 42% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
28 | ALTIRS Giorgio | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
29 | CHEN Evan P. | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | |
30 | SHI Erick | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
31 | LEMPERT Adam | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
32 | ZHUANG Rayken | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - | |
33 | SHINCHUK Daniel | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 4% |
34 | GAJDA Jesse | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
35 | CHENG Hong | 32% | 47% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
36 | CHANG Yuyang | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
37 | WRUBEL Natan G. | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
38 | WANG Oscar | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
39 | SEN David | 18% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
40 | PILAT Matthew J. | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.