University of Maryland, Reckord Armory - College Park, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DEL VECCHIO Nicolas (None PLEASE) S. | - | - | - | 6% | 37% | 57% | |
| 2 | YAN William | - | 4% | 25% | 50% | 21% | ||
| 3 | WESLER Logan A. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
| 3 | JENSBY Jason | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 2% | |
| 5 | CORTEZ Christopher | - | 2% | 18% | 42% | 33% | 6% | |
| 6 | PORTER Dupree | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 7 | GLOZMAN Justin | - | 3% | 22% | 44% | 28% | 4% | |
| 8 | ARIAS Cesar A | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% | |
| 9 | MALAITHONG Nathagorn | 1% | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
| 10 | JONES Graham H. | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 10 | STAMIS Kyle | 3% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 12 | DESSAUER Tobyn M. | 1% | 10% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 1% | |
| 13 | FILATOV Aleksandr | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
| 14 | DECK Tyson | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% | |
| 15 | ZEWDA Kebron | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 9% | |
| 16 | VLASENKO Bohdan | 1% | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 17 | GOLDMAN Ben S. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
| 18 | SU Landon | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 42% | |
| 19 | BEATY Chad A. | - | 1% | 9% | 41% | 48% | ||
| 20 | SO Preston | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 38% | 14% |
| 21 | PAN Alex | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 33% |
| 22 | TOZZI Massimo | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
| 23 | WANG Weiyun | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 24 | POSY Daniel | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
| 25 | KATZ Ryan | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
| 26 | XU Ivan | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 27 | DOARES Andrew | - | - | 4% | 25% | 52% | 19% | |
| 28 | FORT David | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 29 | ORTHMANN Tristin | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 30 | CHEN Jonathan | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 31 | FORMENTI Giulio | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% | |
| 32 | CHIN Matthew W. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 35% | |
| 33 | CRAIN Bennett | - | 2% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 34 | PIWOWAR Alex | 1% | 12% | 42% | 36% | 8% | - | |
| 35 | BRIDGEMAN Andrew T. | 1% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 1% | |
| 36 | RIGGINS Littleton K. | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 37 | EYSTER Edison | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 38 | LIN Felix | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 39 | PARCELL Colby | 33% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | ||
| 40 | COOKSON Leonardo | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 41 | MATT Chris | - | - | < 1% | 5% | 32% | 62% | |
| 42 | MARKOWITZ Jonathan | 22% | 47% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | AERY FALLICK Ozzie | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 5% | |
| 44 | REHM Liam | 20% | 54% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 45 | JACKSON Evan | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 46 | BADMUS Joshua | 1% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 47 | NOVOJILOV Daniel | 86% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 48 | WANG Max | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 49 | SILVERMAN Zachary | 7% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | NOTOPRADONO Nicholas | 9% | 36% | 41% | 13% | 1% | ||
| 51 | STRUCKER Rocco | 40% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 52 | BURNS BULMER Jackson | 37% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 53 | KLEBS Robert | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 54 | PIPKE Garrett | 37% | 52% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | WANG Ziyao | 45% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 56 | JIN Adam | 46% | 47% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 57 | CHENG Brandon | 18% | 45% | 30% | 6% | - | ||
| 58 | FIROOZI Sam | 57% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 58 | PARK Jesse | 16% | 44% | 34% | 5% | - | - | |
| 60 | LANE Jonah | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 61 | BLACKBURN Henry | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 62 | FIROOZI Farzeen | 14% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 63 | MITCHELL Alexander | 59% | 34% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.