University of Maryland, Reckord Armory - College Park, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DEL VECCHIO Nicolas (None PLEASE) S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 57% | |
2 | YAN William | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 21% | ||
3 | WESLER Logan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
3 | JENSBY Jason | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 19% | 2% | |
5 | CORTEZ Christopher | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 38% | 6% | |
6 | PORTER Dupree | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
7 | GLOZMAN Justin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 32% | 4% | |
8 | ARIAS Cesar A | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | |
9 | MALAITHONG Nathagorn | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
10 | JONES Graham H. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 4% | |
10 | STAMIS Kyle | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 6% | - | |
12 | DESSAUER Tobyn M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% | 13% | 1% | |
13 | FILATOV Aleksandr | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
14 | DECK Tyson | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 6% | |
15 | ZEWDA Kebron | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% | |
16 | VLASENKO Bohdan | 100% | 99% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
17 | GOLDMAN Ben S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
18 | SU Landon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% | |
19 | BEATY Chad A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 48% | ||
20 | SO Preston | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
21 | PAN Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
22 | TOZZI Massimo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
23 | WANG Weiyun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
24 | POSY Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
25 | KATZ Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
26 | XU Ivan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
27 | DOARES Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 19% | |
28 | FORT David | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
29 | ORTHMANN Tristin | 100% | 66% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
30 | CHEN Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
31 | FORMENTI Giulio | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 3% | |
32 | CHIN Matthew W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 35% | |
33 | CRAIN Bennett | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
34 | PIWOWAR Alex | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% | 9% | - | |
35 | BRIDGEMAN Andrew T. | 100% | 99% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 1% | |
36 | RIGGINS Littleton K. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
37 | EYSTER Edison | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
38 | LIN Felix | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
39 | PARCELL Colby | 100% | 67% | 21% | 3% | - | ||
40 | COOKSON Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
41 | MATT Chris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% | |
42 | MARKOWITZ Jonathan | 100% | 78% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
43 | AERY FALLICK Ozzie | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 5% | |
44 | REHM Liam | 100% | 80% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
45 | JACKSON Evan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
46 | BADMUS Joshua | 100% | 99% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
47 | NOVOJILOV Daniel | 100% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
48 | WANG Max | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
49 | SILVERMAN Zachary | 100% | 93% | 61% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
50 | NOTOPRADONO Nicholas | 100% | 91% | 55% | 14% | 1% | ||
51 | STRUCKER Rocco | 100% | 60% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
52 | BURNS BULMER Jackson | 100% | 63% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
53 | KLEBS Robert | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
54 | PIPKE Garrett | 100% | 63% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
54 | WANG Ziyao | 100% | 55% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
56 | JIN Adam | 100% | 54% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
57 | CHENG Brandon | 100% | 82% | 37% | 6% | - | ||
58 | FIROOZI Sam | 100% | 43% | 6% | - | - | - | |
58 | PARK Jesse | 100% | 84% | 39% | 6% | - | - | |
60 | LANE Jonah | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
61 | BLACKBURN Henry | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | |
62 | FIROOZI Farzeen | 100% | 86% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
63 | MITCHELL Alexander | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.