Crossroads College Preparatory School - St Louis, MO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TOEWS Jackson | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
2 | ZMUDA Aiden | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
3 | MCMILLIAN Harrison | - | 1% | 5% | 24% | 45% | 25% | |
3 | HICKEY Connor | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
5 | MORALES Isaac | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 4% |
6 | SHI Boris | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 26% | |
7 | HASTINGS Alex | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
8 | LINEBERRY CADEN | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
9 | MA Gangjin | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
10 | WENGER Rowan | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
11 | WOJTALEWICZ Aiden | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
12 | YOUNG Jack | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
13 | DHANOA Kian | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
14 | FEEHAN Conor | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
15 | BALES Gabriel | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
16 | STELLPFLUG Zachary | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | - |
17 | WENGER Liam | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
18 | TAGORE Reyansh | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
19 | BLACK John | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
20 | XU Rambert | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
21 | CHAN William | 7% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
22 | POLYZOIS Alkis | 36% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
23 | DAVIS Jace W. | 7% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
24 | FOSTERVOLD Castiel | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
25 | YATES Graeme | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
26 | CRONK Trevor | 9% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
27 | UNTEREKER Billy | 21% | 40% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.