Irving, TX - Irving, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HOLZ Daniel | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 2 | HUANG Alexander C. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 15% |
| 3 | CHEONG Heonjun | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 3 | SHOMAN Noah | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 5 | CHOI Silas | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
| 6 | SHOMAN Zachary | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% | |
| 7 | KERCHER Alexander | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
| 8 | CRAIG Samuel | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
| 9 | ZHU Kevin | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 10 | QIU Nathan | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% |
| 11 | YU Thomas | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% |
| 12 | ERMAKOV Semeon | - | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% |
| 13 | PATIL Aaryan A. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 45% | 31% |
| 14 | JOO Jeein | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 15 | YANG Dylan | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 16 | RADY-PENTEK Charles A. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 17 | HRISTOV Kris | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 18 | GUREVICH Savely | 4% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 19 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 20 | ANDRES Michael | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 21 | WANG Nicolas | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 22 | ZHOU James Y. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 23 | HOUTZ Mitchell B. | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 24 | CARUSO Massimo | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 25 | PERSAUD Ashwin | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | BOSITA Carson | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 27 | SHERES Asher | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 28 | GUREVICH Benjamin | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 29 | AYALA Nayen L. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% |
| 29 | KILARI Krish | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | ROE Finnegan | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 32 | KALPATHY Rohit | 11% | 38% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | WONG Caleb W. | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | HARASIMUK Gabriel | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% | |
| 35 | SKIMEL Michael | 14% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 36 | WOLFE Alex | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 37 | KIM ELIJAH | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 38 | STEPHANOUK Ian | 63% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | SHIN DJ | 12% | 43% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | ZHOU William | 6% | 32% | 42% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | PARKILA Lukas | 50% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.