Irving, TX - Irving, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HOLZ Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% |
| 2 | HUANG Alexander C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
| 3 | CHEONG Heonjun | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 3 | SHOMAN Noah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 5 | CHOI Silas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
| 6 | SHOMAN Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | |
| 7 | KERCHER Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
| 8 | CRAIG Samuel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 9 | ZHU Kevin | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 10 | QIU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
| 11 | YU Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 12% |
| 12 | ERMAKOV Semeon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% |
| 13 | PATIL Aaryan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 31% |
| 14 | JOO Jeein | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 15 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 16 | RADY-PENTEK Charles A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
| 17 | HRISTOV Kris | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 18 | GUREVICH Savely | 100% | 96% | 67% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 19 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 20 | ANDRES Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 21 | WANG Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 22 | ZHOU James Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 23 | HOUTZ Mitchell B. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 24 | CARUSO Massimo | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 25 | PERSAUD Ashwin | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | BOSITA Carson | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 27 | SHERES Asher | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 28 | GUREVICH Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 29 | AYALA Nayen L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
| 29 | KILARI Krish | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | ROE Finnegan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 32 | KALPATHY Rohit | 100% | 89% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | WONG Caleb W. | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | HARASIMUK Gabriel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
| 35 | SKIMEL Michael | 100% | 86% | 52% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 36 | WOLFE Alex | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 37 | KIM ELIJAH | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 38 | STEPHANOUK Ian | 100% | 37% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | SHIN DJ | 100% | 88% | 45% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | ZHOU William | 100% | 94% | 63% | 20% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | PARKILA Lukas | 100% | 50% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.