Irving, TX - Irving, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
2 | NEWHARD Zelia K. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% | |
3 | DING Abigail | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% | |
3 | SENIC Adeline | - | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% |
5 | LEE Angelina S. | - | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
6 | ATLURI Srija | - | - | 3% | 14% | 36% | 38% | 9% |
7 | BRADFORD Meeah | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
8 | ZHAO Sophie L. | - | - | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% |
9 | DUAN Konnie | - | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% |
10 | CHON Sydney | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
11 | GUERRA Sofia E. | - | - | - | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
12 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | 3% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
13 | LEE Ariana | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
14 | SCHUEPPERT Amelia V. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
15 | BATRA Chaahat | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
16 | WANDJI Anais | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
17 | TAN Clarisse | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
18 | SHUM Elizabeth | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
19 | LIU Michelle J. | 1% | 12% | 42% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - |
20 | CAO Domi Yu En | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
21 | HWANG Jungmin | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
22 | SCHUEPPERT Chloe M. | 35% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
23 | GAO Esther S. | 40% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
24 | STEPHENSON Jenna | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
25 | SHORI Manisha K. | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
26 | VAUGHAN Norah | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
27 | MALHOTRA Simran | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.