Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XIA Dashan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | |
| 2 | TRULL A.J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | |
| 3 | ZENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | |
| 3 | BAJAJ Nakul | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 4% | |
| 5 | TSE Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | |
| 6 | TRAN Spencer | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 17% | |
| 7 | NGO-D'ANDRE Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 16% | |
| 8 | KABA Elias | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 5% | |
| 9 | ZHANG Marcus Xuanwei | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
| 10 | GINZBURG Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 11 | SINGLETON Aman | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 15% | |
| 11 | CHEN Edward | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 4% | |
| 13 | CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% | |
| 14 | KARIMOV Amir | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% | |
| 15 | CHEN Tianjun | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 16 | LECUYER-SCHOONMAKER Declan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 29% | 4% |
| 17 | JIANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 30% | |
| 17 | SUN Lucas | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 14% | 1% | |
| 19 | ZHAO Pierce | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 34% | 3% | |
| 20 | CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 24% | |
| 21 | IPPOLITO-JOHN Matteo | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 22 | HANNA Alexander | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | LIU Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | |
| 24 | LI Ray | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 11% | - | |
| 25 | GLUSHKOV David | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 26 | CRESPO Nathaniel Justus | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
| 27 | CHEN Jayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% | |
| 28 | TSIEN Richard | 100% | 100% | 92% | 57% | 17% | 2% | |
| 29 | HE Yurui | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 2% | |
| 30 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% | |
| 31 | KOPPENHEFFER Rowan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 3% | |
| 31 | ZHANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 19% | 1% | |
| 33 | ERIKSEN Casey | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 21% | 3% | |
| 34 | ROSIELLO Francesco | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | SUH Aiden | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
| 36 | BRADSHAW Carter | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% | |
| 37 | MANSFIELD Hunter | 100% | 100% | 90% | 53% | 14% | 1% | |
| 38 | CUMMINGS Owen | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 39 | SHAPIRO Natan | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 40 | LI Jade | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 23% | |
| 41 | MORI Seneca | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 42 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 7% | |
| 43 | KOGAN Yelisey L. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 2% | |
| 44 | BOXER Eishan | 100% | 96% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | MA YIXING (Tiger) | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | |
| 45 | RADZIKOWSKI Sam | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% | |
| 47 | MECHREFE Anthony | 100% | 88% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | STARKIE Kitteridge | 100% | 94% | 68% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 48 | ROBINSON Garrett | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 50 | BENNETT Nathaniel | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 51 | GUNDUBOGULA Saket | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 52 | FOGEL Jake | 100% | 80% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 53 | OSHIMA Robert | 100% | 84% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 54 | ZHENG Jason | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 55 | MOZZER Nolan | 100% | 91% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 56 | AU Joshua | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 57 | JOSEPHS Liam | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 58 | WANG-SONG Evan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 5% | |
| 59 | JHA Adarsh | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 60 | BRESLAV Asher | 100% | 85% | 32% | 5% | - | - | |
| 61 | GOVOROV Alexander | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 62 | HELMY Richard | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 4% | |
| 63 | CHAN Tyler | 100% | 91% | 57% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 64 | SPALDING Elihu | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 19% | 2% | |
| 65 | MASSE Dean | 100% | 67% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 66 | GU Eric | 100% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 67 | HAN Nathan | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 68 | BYRON Max | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 68 | CHAVES Evan | 100% | 76% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
| 70 | WITHERELL Logan | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 71 | RICK Dylan | 100% | 38% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 72 | MITTELMAN Maximilian | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 72 | HIJAZ Daniel | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.