Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | CHENG Ethan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 42% | 48% |
| 2 | TAN Aidan | - | - | - | 7% | 46% | 47% |
| 3 | LI Eric | - | - | - | 5% | 36% | 58% |
| 3 | GONG Benjamin | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 37% |
| 5 | LIN Michael | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 84% |
| 5 | KNIZHNIK David | - | - | - | 1% | 19% | 80% |
| 7 | LIU Derek | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
| 8 | KONG Luculentus X. | - | - | 1% | 14% | 49% | 36% |
| 9 | YAO Bradley | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% |
| 10 | LIN James G. | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 69% |
| 10 | LIU Ethan | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 49% |
| 10 | CHA James | - | 6% | 31% | 46% | 15% | 1% |
| 13 | LI Aaron | - | - | 3% | 26% | 53% | 18% |
| 14 | XU Andy P. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 53% | 37% |
| 15 | WANG Brian | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 31% | 3% |
| 16 | HOU Gaven | 2% | 18% | 46% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 17 | WANG Rory | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 51% | 11% |
| 18 | KAPOOR Aayan | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 40% | 13% |
| 19 | PLASTARAS Trey | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 39% | 11% |
| 20 | SHAO Eric | - | - | 1% | 15% | 48% | 36% |
| 21 | ABRAMKIN Tim | - | 4% | 26% | 49% | 20% | 1% |
| 22 | TANG Terry | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 25% | 2% |
| 23 | XU Nathan | 1% | 12% | 37% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | CHENG Logan | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 40% | 11% |
| 25 | JIMENEZ Naveen | - | - | 6% | 39% | 46% | 8% |
| 26 | YANG Dylan | - | 6% | 31% | 43% | 18% | 2% |
| 27 | PECK Quinn | - | 4% | 25% | 50% | 20% | 1% |
| 28 | ZHAO Brian | 1% | 11% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 1% |
| 29 | HE Xiangrui | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% |
| 30 | TANG Jeremy | 5% | 35% | 44% | 15% | 1% | - |
| 31 | BLACK Zachary | - | 1% | 11% | 46% | 37% | 5% |
| 32 | FAN Sean | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 33 | ARCE Andrew W. | - | - | 6% | 33% | 52% | 9% |
| 34 | TAHOUN Mostafa | - | - | - | 2% | 26% | 71% |
| 35 | JIANG Owen | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% |
| 36 | CHO Xzander | - | 6% | 27% | 45% | 19% | 2% |
| 37 | XU Ethan | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 32% | 6% |
| 38 | ZHEN Ethan | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 42% | 13% |
| 39 | SURESH Rohan | - | 4% | 25% | 43% | 24% | 4% |
| 39 | WAYBRIGHT Matteo | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 41 | GATES Combustion | 10% | 47% | 36% | 6% | - | - |
| 42 | YANG David H. | 7% | 39% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 43 | ZHAO Brandon | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 44 | JIN Andy | 1% | 13% | 40% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 45 | VISHAWADIA Jaimin | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 2% |
| 46 | SABATINO Patrick | 12% | 39% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 47 | FROST Chayse | 24% | 46% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 48 | LI Ayren | - | - | 7% | 35% | 52% | 6% |
| 49 | PETINO Leonardo | 4% | 35% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 49 | LINDEMANN Marc | 1% | 13% | 39% | 40% | 7% | - |
| 51 | CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau | 4% | 29% | 47% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 52 | SMITH Grant D. | - | - | 3% | 23% | 51% | 22% |
| 53 | STAFFORD Gareth | 3% | 25% | 48% | 20% | 2% | - |
| 54 | FENG Michael | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 46% | 14% |
| 55 | HAN Alexander | 5% | 28% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 56 | ONIK Ari N. | 2% | 19% | 43% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 57 | CHANDRAMOHAN Aran | 2% | 22% | 46% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 58 | LYNCH Owen C. | - | 4% | 24% | 49% | 21% | 2% |
| 59 | RIPA Joseph K. | 9% | 37% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 60 | JABLOKOV Roman | 35% | 44% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | REN Ryan | 34% | 47% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | MCENTEE Owen | 50% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | DIAZ Gabriel | 12% | 52% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 64 | LAO Kevin | 5% | 29% | 42% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 65 | TIBBETTS Justin | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 66 | SFINTESCU Alex | 5% | 27% | 45% | 22% | 2% | - |
| 67 | BERETICH Brian | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 68 | WIDOFF-WOODSON Jackson Leroi | 19% | 50% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
| 69 | AYYAGARI Abhiram | 17% | 46% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
| 70 | FEINBERG James Y. | 19% | 45% | 29% | 7% | - | - |
| 71 | CHUN Zachary | 17% | 51% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 72 | MCCARTHY Hudson | 56% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 73 | MAGAZU Christopher | 9% | 46% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 74 | DEROSA Patrick | 31% | 50% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 75 | HU Daniel | 10% | 44% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 76 | LINDEMANN Conrad | 69% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 77 | BRILLANTES Luke | 12% | 39% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 78 | BLACK Henry | 41% | 44% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 79 | WANG Luke | 40% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | LAMB Michael | 40% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 81 | SENDZIK Markus | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 82 | CHUN Alexander | 62% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 82 | WITTEN Lachlan | 68% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 82 | CHENG Andrew | 66% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.