Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SPRINGER Sierra | - | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 84% |
2 | WANG Zoe | - | - | 1% | 7% | 37% | 56% | |
3 | CHI Chelsea | - | - | 2% | 15% | 52% | 32% | |
3 | WITTER Catherine A. | - | - | - | 3% | 29% | 68% | |
5 | LI Fei | - | - | 1% | 10% | 42% | 47% | |
6 | SEREGIN Katya | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 55% | |
7 | LIN Elaine | - | - | 1% | 8% | 45% | 46% | |
8 | XU Serena | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 14% | |
9 | CAFASSO Natalya | - | - | - | 6% | 36% | 57% | |
10 | PRESMAN Aerin | - | - | 5% | 27% | 45% | 23% | |
11 | AZMEH nour | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% | |
12 | LI Caroline | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 1% |
13 | DHAIYA Tanya | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 17% | 2% | |
14 | XIAO Nancy | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 46% | 13% | |
15 | PETROFF Eva | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 1% | |
16 | FENG ge | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 66% | |
17 | SHU Youshan | - | - | 3% | 23% | 51% | 22% | |
18 | SONG Angela | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 55% | |
19 | SHEFFIELD Skye | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 48% | 10% | |
20 | YANG Hanting | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 45% | 11% | |
21 | TRAN Helena | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 39% | 12% | |
22 | WANG Chloe | 3% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 7% | - | |
23 | CHEN Alina | 1% | 12% | 37% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
23 | NING Miranda | 1% | 8% | 32% | 42% | 17% | 2% | |
25 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 62% | |
26 | LIN Victoria T. | 1% | 13% | 47% | 32% | 7% | - | |
26 | WANG Sophie Y. | - | 2% | 17% | 46% | 31% | 4% | |
28 | PRIHODKO Nina | - | - | 5% | 27% | 50% | 16% | |
29 | GEFFNER Olivia | 9% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
30 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
31 | BI Michelle | 4% | 27% | 43% | 22% | 3% | - | |
32 | LAW Mila | 24% | 44% | 26% | 6% | - | - | |
33 | LOBANOVA Varvara | - | 10% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | |
34 | YU Eva | 2% | 15% | 40% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
35 | HAUSHEER Kuncen | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 44% | 12% | |
36 | ZHANG Jane | 2% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 7% | - | |
37 | LAI Amanda | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 39% | 6% | |
38 | SHEIKH PAREE | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
39 | BISONO Valentina | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 7% | - |
40 | XU Mulan | 27% | 50% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
41 | FENG Iris | 3% | 20% | 45% | 26% | 5% | - | |
42 | LI Alice | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 14% | 1% | |
43 | SONKU Mira | 26% | 48% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
44 | KAUR Manroop | - | 4% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 5% | |
45 | CHEN Alicia | - | 4% | 31% | 46% | 17% | 2% | |
46 | QI Julieanne | - | - | 6% | 29% | 44% | 21% | |
47 | GOLIYAD Lisa | 4% | 26% | 43% | 24% | 3% | - | |
48 | YU Livia | 23% | 46% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
49 | ERIKSEN Kate | 42% | 50% | 8% | - | - | - | |
50 | MEYER Rachel | 3% | 19% | 42% | 29% | 7% | - | |
51 | HOAGLAND Sally | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | - |
52 | CHEN Allison | 56% | 39% | 5% | - | - | - | |
53 | ZOU You yang (Yoyo) | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 3% | |
54 | PAN Angela | - | 7% | 42% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
55 | JIANG chenxi | 20% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
56 | LI Yixin Catherine | 2% | 22% | 43% | 28% | 4% | - | |
57 | YOUN Emily | 36% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
58 | SONG Charlotte | 24% | 55% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
59 | MEYER Rebecca | 2% | 14% | 40% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
60 | NGUYEN Celena | 8% | 31% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - | |
61 | SHIN Jamie | 41% | 49% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
62 | DING Iris Siyue | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
63 | TIBBETTS Lily | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
64 | TIAN Victoria | 32% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
65 | CHI Sarah | 2% | 43% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | |
66 | ADAMS Agatha | 28% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
67 | LE NOC’H Farrah | 59% | 34% | 7% | - | - | - | |
68 | IVANUSHKINA Alisa | 47% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
69 | SANCHEZ Natasha | 7% | 49% | 36% | 8% | - | - | |
70 | STOCKTON Catherine | 40% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
71 | CHOWRIRA Reynah | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
72 | BUES Caelan | 94% | 6% | - | - | - | - | |
73 | WU Madisen | 28% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.