Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SPRINGER Sierra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% |
| 2 | WANG Zoe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 56% | |
| 3 | CHI Chelsea | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 32% | |
| 3 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | |
| 5 | LI Fei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 47% | |
| 6 | SEREGIN Katya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | |
| 7 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 46% | |
| 8 | XU Serena | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 14% | |
| 9 | CAFASSO Natalya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 57% | |
| 10 | PRESMAN Aerin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 23% | |
| 11 | AZMEH nour | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% | |
| 12 | LI Caroline | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 23% | 1% |
| 13 | DHAIYA Tanya | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | 2% | |
| 14 | XIAO Nancy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 13% | |
| 15 | PETROFF Eva | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 15% | 1% | |
| 16 | FENG ge | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% | |
| 17 | SHU Youshan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 22% | |
| 18 | SONG Angela | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% | |
| 19 | SHEFFIELD Skye | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 10% | |
| 20 | YANG Hanting | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 11% | |
| 21 | TRAN Helena | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 12% | |
| 22 | WANG Chloe | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 8% | - | |
| 23 | CHEN Alina | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 12% | 1% | |
| 23 | NING Miranda | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 19% | 2% | |
| 25 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 62% | |
| 26 | LIN Victoria T. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 40% | 7% | - | |
| 26 | WANG Sophie Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 35% | 4% | |
| 28 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 16% | |
| 29 | GEFFNER Olivia | 100% | 91% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
| 31 | BI Michelle | 100% | 96% | 69% | 25% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | LAW Mila | 100% | 76% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
| 33 | LOBANOVA Varvara | 100% | 100% | 90% | 53% | 16% | 2% | |
| 34 | YU Eva | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% | 9% | 1% | |
| 35 | HAUSHEER Kuncen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 12% | |
| 36 | ZHANG Jane | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 7% | - | |
| 37 | LAI Amanda | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% | 6% | |
| 38 | SHEIKH PAREE | 100% | 87% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | BISONO Valentina | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 40 | XU Mulan | 100% | 73% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 41 | FENG Iris | 100% | 97% | 77% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 42 | LI Alice | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 16% | 1% | |
| 43 | SONKU Mira | 100% | 74% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 44 | KAUR Manroop | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 5% | |
| 45 | CHEN Alicia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% | 19% | 2% | |
| 46 | QI Julieanne | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 21% | |
| 47 | GOLIYAD Lisa | 100% | 96% | 70% | 27% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | YU Livia | 100% | 77% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
| 49 | ERIKSEN Kate | 100% | 58% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 50 | MEYER Rachel | 100% | 97% | 78% | 36% | 7% | - | |
| 51 | HOAGLAND Sally | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% | - |
| 52 | CHEN Allison | 100% | 44% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 53 | ZOU You yang (Yoyo) | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 3% | |
| 54 | PAN Angela | 100% | 100% | 93% | 51% | 11% | 1% | |
| 55 | JIANG chenxi | 100% | 80% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | LI Yixin Catherine | 100% | 98% | 76% | 33% | 4% | - | |
| 57 | YOUN Emily | 100% | 64% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 58 | SONG Charlotte | 100% | 76% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
| 59 | MEYER Rebecca | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% | 10% | 1% | |
| 60 | NGUYEN Celena | 100% | 92% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 61 | SHIN Jamie | 100% | 59% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 62 | DING Iris Siyue | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 63 | TIBBETTS Lily | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 64 | TIAN Victoria | 100% | 68% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 65 | CHI Sarah | 100% | 98% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 66 | ADAMS Agatha | 100% | 72% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 67 | LE NOC’H Farrah | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 68 | IVANUSHKINA Alisa | 100% | 53% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 69 | SANCHEZ Natasha | 100% | 93% | 45% | 8% | - | - | |
| 70 | STOCKTON Catherine | 100% | 60% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 71 | CHOWRIRA Reynah | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 72 | BUES Caelan | 100% | 6% | - | - | - | - | |
| 73 | WU Madisen | 100% | 72% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.