Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZELDIN Nadia | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 2 | SHENG Katherine | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 3 | BING Charlotte | - | - | - | 7% | 38% | 55% | |
| 3 | ORRINGER Lottie | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
| 5 | DE CASTRO Kai | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% | |
| 6 | BO Iris | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% | |
| 7 | YIN Chloe | - | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 43% | 8% |
| 8 | CHEN Sophie | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 32% | 7% |
| 9 | BROWN Lola | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
| 10 | LI savannah | - | - | 6% | 30% | 48% | 16% | |
| 11 | LI Christina | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 12 | JANSSEN Juliane | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 13 | CHAN Jolene | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 14 | JIANG Chloe | - | - | 5% | 22% | 42% | 31% | |
| 15 | CHUNG Stella | 1% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 16 | MANGLANI Maya | 2% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 17 | MULLER Amara | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 18 | SHANG Arianna | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 19 | GOODMAN Carden | 3% | 32% | 46% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 20 | BERTOLINI Mia | - | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 21 | SFINTESCU Emma | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 22 | TOROPOVA Arina | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 23 | JIANG Doris | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 24 | POLING Katherine | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 25 | FEDER Acadia | 2% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 26 | ZINITI-LAU Elena | - | 4% | 24% | 47% | 23% | 3% | |
| 27 | BYK Karalina | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 28 | SHUTZER Lily | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | - |
| 29 | OTTAVIANO Maris | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 30 | RADVANY Simone | - | 8% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 31 | GUILLETTE Hazel | 3% | 35% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | GOMEZ Sofia | 59% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 33 | MCCORMICK Ella | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | LENZ Phoebe | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 35 | BENNETT Emi | 7% | 32% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | SINGH Evangelina | < 1% | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 4% |
| 37 | ATTICKS rachel | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | GUSTAFSSON Anna | 79% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 39 | FLORES Heide | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.