Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZELDIN Nadia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% |
| 2 | SHENG Katherine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 47% |
| 3 | BING Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 55% | |
| 3 | ORRINGER Lottie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | |
| 5 | DE CASTRO Kai | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% | |
| 6 | BO Iris | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% | |
| 7 | YIN Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 8% |
| 8 | CHEN Sophie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 39% | 7% |
| 9 | BROWN Lola | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% |
| 10 | LI savannah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 16% | |
| 11 | LI Christina | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 12 | JANSSEN Juliane | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 13 | CHAN Jolene | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 14 | JIANG Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 31% | |
| 15 | CHUNG Stella | 100% | 99% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 16 | MANGLANI Maya | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 17 | MULLER Amara | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 18 | SHANG Arianna | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 19 | GOODMAN Carden | 100% | 97% | 65% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 20 | BERTOLINI Mia | 100% | 100% | 88% | 55% | 19% | 2% | |
| 21 | SFINTESCU Emma | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
| 22 | TOROPOVA Arina | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 23 | JIANG Doris | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 24 | POLING Katherine | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% | |
| 25 | FEDER Acadia | 100% | 98% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 26 | ZINITI-LAU Elena | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 25% | 3% | |
| 27 | BYK Karalina | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 28 | SHUTZER Lily | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | - |
| 29 | OTTAVIANO Maris | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 30 | RADVANY Simone | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% | |
| 31 | GUILLETTE Hazel | 100% | 97% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | GOMEZ Sofia | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 33 | MCCORMICK Ella | 100% | 77% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | LENZ Phoebe | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 35 | BENNETT Emi | 100% | 93% | 61% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 36 | SINGH Evangelina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 28% | 4% |
| 37 | ATTICKS rachel | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | GUSTAFSSON Anna | 100% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 39 | FLORES Heide | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.