Fencers Club Inc. - New York, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GRIFFITHS Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | |
| 2 | MAO Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% | |
| 3 | SVERDLOV Seth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 57% | 5% | |
| 3 | KNOX James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 28% | |
| 5 | BOUMEDIENNE Sami | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% | |
| 6 | ZHAO Kuncheng | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
| 7 | REPIC Oliver | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 5% | |
| 8 | KRAVIT Connor BE | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 46% | |
| 9 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% |
| 10 | DANIEL Camron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 17% |
| 11 | NORMILE Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 13% | |
| 12 | CHOI Joong Kyung | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% | |
| 13 | FAICCO Joseph | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 14 | YU Samuel | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 14% | 1% | |
| 15 | RIM Eugene | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 16 | GAO "George" Xiaojiang | 100% | 96% | 57% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | LONGSTREET Jeffrey | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 18 | BUACHIE Aaron | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 19% | 1% | |
| 19 | LI Morgan | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 20 | CZEPLA Andrew | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 21 | FIEDERLEIN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 16% | 2% |
| 22 | MILINKOVIC Maksim | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 23 | MCGRATH Sean | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 8% | - | |
| 24 | KNIPSCHER Riley | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
| 25 | RIVERA Louis | 100% | 98% | 69% | 22% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | WONG Maximus | 100% | 90% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | SCHIAVONE Oreste | 100% | 96% | 68% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 28 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | 100% | 95% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 29 | POLSTER Joshua | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 30 | NG Nico | 100% | 68% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 31 | WALTING Paul | 100% | 95% | 64% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | KONG Martin | 100% | 93% | 63% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | WEAVER David | 100% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 35 | YU David | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 36 | MOORE James | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 37 | RIVERA Rangel | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 38 | CHI Evelyn | 100% | 86% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.