Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
| 2 | ROMAGNOLI Isabella | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 3 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 36% | 58% |
| 3 | ALCEBAR Kayla | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | |
| 5 | YANG Ashley M. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 6 | ADEBANKE Niara | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% |
| 7 | GRAFF Sophie | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 8 | YUAN Greta | - | - | 1% | 12% | 38% | 37% | 11% |
| 9 | NATHANSON Samantha E. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
| 10 | LI Amanda C. | - | - | - | 6% | 28% | 44% | 22% |
| 11 | LU Elaine | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 12 | KIM Marley I. | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 7% | |
| 13 | PROCACCINI Ashten V. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 22% | 3% |
| 14 | YU Melinda | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
| 15 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | |
| 16 | MANSPERGER Leena | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 17 | PAUL Lila | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 18 | MAREK Sofia | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 6% |
| 19 | WEI Vivian W. | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 20 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | - | - | 5% | 26% | 55% | 14% | - |
| 21 | LIGH Erenei J. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 22 | SINHA Anika | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 29% | |
| 23 | LEE Sophia | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 23 | SOURIMTO Valeria | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 45% |
| 25 | MIKA Veronica | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 26 | WHALEN Paige C. | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 27 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 28 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 2% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 29 | OBRADOVIC Ana | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
| 30 | HUANG Caroline | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
| 31 | LEE Hannah | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | HILD Nisha | 1% | 11% | 36% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 33 | DUCKETT Madison | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 10% |
| 34 | SO Catelyn | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 46% | 24% |
| 35 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
| 36 | NG Sarah W. | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 37 | MEYERSON Victoria | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 38 | PASHIN Anna | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 7% |
| 39 | REN Xinling | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 40 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | - | 3% | 20% | 47% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 41 | WANG Audrey | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 42 | ZHANG Sophie | 1% | 11% | 36% | 38% | 13% | 1% | |
| 43 | TSUI Natalie | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 44 | NAYAK Esha | 20% | 44% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | JAVERI Amaya | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 46 | MURRAY Audrey A. | 30% | 46% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 47 | MESSICK Maya | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 48 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 49 | HE Lizbeth | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 50 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 5% | 26% | 43% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | MCKEE Ainsley | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 52 | ANGIOLETTI Kazandra | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 53 | FIC Karolina E. | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 54 | FIC Isabelle K. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 55 | KIM Sydney | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 56 | LI Sophie | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 6% | |
| 57 | ELNATAN Mica A. | 29% | 49% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 58 | YU Abriella R. | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | LAMMER Sophie G. | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 60 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 5% | 29% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | NAYAK Anika | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 62 | YOUNG Audrey | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 63 | YEN Natalie | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 64 | DUBE Naomi | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | FESTA Carina | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | MARYASH Samantha | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 67 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU Alexandra | - | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 68 | KAPLAN Gabriela | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 69 | WU Allison Y. | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 70 | YAN Lena | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 71 | XU Alina | 14% | 52% | 28% | 6% | - | - | |
| 72 | STRIZHEVSKY Ariel | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 73 | SHUM Madyson | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 74 | ALTIRS Kate | 16% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 75 | MCKEE Brynnley | 17% | 42% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.