Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
| 2 | ROMAGNOLI Isabella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 13% |
| 3 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 58% |
| 3 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% | |
| 5 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
| 6 | ADEBANKE Niara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 35% |
| 7 | GRAFF Sophie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
| 8 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 11% |
| 9 | NATHANSON Samantha E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
| 10 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 22% |
| 11 | LU Elaine | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 12 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% | |
| 13 | PROCACCINI Ashten V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 26% | 3% |
| 14 | YU Melinda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 11% |
| 15 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% | |
| 16 | MANSPERGER Leena | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 17 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
| 18 | MAREK Sofia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 36% | 6% |
| 19 | WEI Vivian W. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 20 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 14% | - |
| 21 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
| 22 | SINHA Anika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% | |
| 23 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | SOURIMTO Valeria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% |
| 25 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 26 | WHALEN Paige C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 5% |
| 27 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 28 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 29 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
| 30 | HUANG Caroline | 100% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 31 | LEE Hannah | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 33 | DUCKETT Madison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 10% |
| 34 | SO Catelyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 24% |
| 35 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 15% | 1% |
| 36 | NG Sarah W. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 1% |
| 37 | MEYERSON Victoria | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | |
| 38 | PASHIN Anna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 7% |
| 39 | REN Xinling | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 40 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 30% | 5% | - |
| 41 | WANG Audrey | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 42 | ZHANG Sophie | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 14% | 1% | |
| 43 | TSUI Natalie | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 44 | NAYAK Esha | 100% | 80% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | JAVERI Amaya | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 46 | MURRAY Audrey A. | 100% | 70% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 47 | MESSICK Maya | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 48 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 49 | HE Lizbeth | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 50 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 100% | 95% | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | MCKEE Ainsley | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 52 | ANGIOLETTI Kazandra | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 53 | FIC Karolina E. | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 54 | FIC Isabelle K. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 55 | KIM Sydney | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 56 | LI Sophie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 36% | 6% | |
| 57 | ELNATAN Mica A. | 100% | 71% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 58 | YU Abriella R. | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | LAMMER Sophie G. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 60 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 100% | 95% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | NAYAK Anika | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 62 | YOUNG Audrey | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 63 | YEN Natalie | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 64 | DUBE Naomi | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | FESTA Carina | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | MARYASH Samantha | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 67 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 68 | KAPLAN Gabriela | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 69 | WU Allison Y. | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 70 | YAN Lena | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 71 | XU Alina | 100% | 86% | 34% | 6% | - | - | |
| 72 | STRIZHEVSKY Ariel | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 73 | SHUM Madyson | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 74 | ALTIRS Kate | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 75 | MCKEE Brynnley | 100% | 83% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.