Irving, TX - Irving, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HO Brianna W. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% |
| 2 | GUERRA Sofia E. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 41% | 34% |
| 3 | DING Abigail | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 3 | LOCKE Savannah | - | - | 6% | 27% | 45% | 22% | |
| 5 | DUAN Konnie | - | 1% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 13% | |
| 6 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 1% |
| 7 | SENIC Adeline | - | - | 8% | 31% | 42% | 19% | |
| 8 | KOKES Gwendolen | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | - |
| 9 | LEE Ariana | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
| 10 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 84% |
| 11 | CAO Domi Yu En | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 5% |
| 12 | ZHAO Sophie L. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 4% |
| 13 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | 3% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 7% | |
| 14 | LI Sophia M. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 15 | HWANG Jungmin | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | LIU Jaelyn A. | - | 4% | 24% | 42% | 24% | 4% | |
| 17 | BATRA Chaahat | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% | |
| 17 | WANDJI Anais | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 31% | |
| 19 | NEWHARD Zelia K. | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% | |
| 20 | SHUM Elizabeth | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 21 | SHORI Manisha K. | 2% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 22 | SHA Yi Ling | 4% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 23 | HOANG Mai | 1% | 12% | 41% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
| 24 | LIU Michelle J. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 25 | SHORI Samantha | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 26 | VAUGHAN Norah | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | MALHOTRA Simran | 37% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 28 | WANG Jasmine | - | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 29 | KIM April | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 30 | COOPER Piper W. | 19% | 50% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 31 | SHUM Maya | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 32 | LI Irina | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 33 | SCHUEPPERT Chloe M. | 54% | 39% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 34 | SULTER Aurelie | 43% | 49% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 35 | HONG Elizabeth R. | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 36 | CHANG Elizabeth | < 1% | 2% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 8% | |
| 37 | POPOKH Aleksandra | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | DODDABALLAPUR Saanvi | 17% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | MASON-DARNELL Zoe | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.