Irving, TX - Irving, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HO Brianna W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
| 2 | GUERRA Sofia E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
| 3 | DING Abigail | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | |
| 3 | LOCKE Savannah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 22% | |
| 5 | DUAN Konnie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 13% | |
| 6 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 19% | 1% |
| 7 | SENIC Adeline | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 60% | 19% | |
| 8 | KOKES Gwendolen | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% | - |
| 9 | LEE Ariana | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | 2% |
| 10 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% |
| 11 | CAO Domi Yu En | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 5% |
| 12 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 13 | CASTANEDA Keira | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 7% | |
| 14 | LI Sophia M. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 15 | HWANG Jungmin | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 16 | LIU Jaelyn A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 29% | 4% | |
| 17 | BATRA Chaahat | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 14% | |
| 17 | WANDJI Anais | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 31% | |
| 19 | NEWHARD Zelia K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 13% | |
| 20 | SHUM Elizabeth | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 21 | SHORI Manisha K. | 100% | 98% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 22 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 23 | HOANG Mai | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% | 11% | 1% | |
| 24 | LIU Michelle J. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 25 | SHORI Samantha | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 26 | VAUGHAN Norah | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | MALHOTRA Simran | 100% | 63% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 28 | WANG Jasmine | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 29 | KIM April | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 30 | COOPER Piper W. | 100% | 81% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
| 31 | SHUM Maya | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 32 | LI Irina | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 33 | SCHUEPPERT Chloe M. | 100% | 46% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 34 | SULTER Aurelie | 100% | 57% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 35 | HONG Elizabeth R. | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 36 | CHANG Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 39% | 8% | |
| 37 | POPOKH Aleksandra | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | DODDABALLAPUR Saanvi | 100% | 83% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | MASON-DARNELL Zoe | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.