University of Maryland, Reckord Armory - College Park, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | JAN Stephen | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% |
2 | PAI Dong-Ying | - | - | 1% | 9% | 43% | 47% |
3 | WOOD Alexander W. | - | 2% | 17% | 46% | 34% | |
3 | FLANAGAN James | - | 4% | 24% | 47% | 25% | |
5 | DIAZ Julio P. | - | - | - | 8% | 46% | 46% |
6 | KURPASKA Jonathan A. | - | 9% | 35% | 39% | 15% | 1% |
7 | GROSS Stephen R. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 52% | 33% |
8 | ABRAHAMS Paul | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% |
9 | RADU Andrew | - | - | 14% | 39% | 36% | 11% |
10 | MASTRONARDI Joseph M. | 5% | 27% | 45% | 21% | 2% | - |
11 | RIFFATERRE Jason | 3% | 23% | 45% | 25% | 4% | |
12 | VIVEROS Oscar A. | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - |
13 | BEREKNYEI Thomas | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
14 | RUSANOV Oleg | 7% | 49% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
15 | ZEIN ELABEDIN Tamer | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 10% |
16 | LEE Hans | 23% | 62% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
17 | COTLAR Andrew D. | - | 1% | 18% | 41% | 32% | 8% |
18 | BHATT Jay | 18% | 47% | 29% | 6% | - | |
19 | WAY Kashi M. | - | - | 10% | 34% | 40% | 15% |
20 | FADL Omar | - | 4% | 26% | 43% | 23% | 3% |
21 | WOOD BEn | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% | 1% |
22 | GUERRERO Gonzalo | 1% | 10% | 35% | 43% | 10% | 1% |
23 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | 6% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - |
24 | CHAO Pierre | 20% | 47% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
25 | MYERS Kenneth | 66% | 32% | 2% | - | - | - |
26 | WU Geoffrey | 45% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
27 | BUCHANAN Jonah | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
28 | CHANDLEE Thomas | 37% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
29 | CHANDLEE Richard (Rick) | 78% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.