University of Maryland, Reckord Armory - College Park, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Shuang | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% | |
| 2 | MEI Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
| 3 | RENTON Samantha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% |
| 3 | LI Katerina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 29% | 2% |
| 5 | HOOSHI Erica S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 87% | |
| 5 | SHMUKLER Maria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 12% | |
| 7 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
| 8 | OWENS Elise | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 9 | LIU Long | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | 1% | |
| 10 | SHICK Veronika | 100% | 98% | 81% | 38% | 8% | 1% | |
| 11 | DONG Emily | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% | 3% | |
| 12 | CAO Kayla | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 13 | LEE Alice | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 14 | PHAN Logan | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 15 | OWEN Ashley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 28% | 2% |
| 16 | FELLMAN Sara | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 3% | |
| 17 | SHERLOCK Gabriella | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 10% | 1% | |
| 18 | BASSIK Judith M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 37% | |
| 19 | MADDOX Lacey E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% | 5% | |
| 20 | LAM Victoria M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | 17% | - | |
| 21 | WATERS Samantha M. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 22 | TAYLOR-OSBORN Nadia | 100% | 95% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 23 | MCGRATH Polina S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 34% | 6% |
| 24 | SULLIVAN Redmond | 100% | 94% | 33% | 4% | - | - | |
| 25 | PONCET Sarah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% | |
| 26 | GANDLURI Sreehitha | 100% | 100% | 88% | 39% | 5% | - | |
| 27 | WESTGATE Rebecca | 100% | 81% | 33% | 6% | - | - | |
| 28 | KATS Ekaterina | 100% | 99% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 29 | GORDON Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% | |
| 30 | BARCZAK Rebekah | 100% | 82% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | MOORE Addisyn | 100% | 77% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | ABD-ELMONIEM Nusayba K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 44% | 9% |
| 33 | MARKERT Delaney | 100% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 34 | WU Lorena | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 35 | ZHANG Tingyun (Linda) | 100% | 79% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 36 | FERGUSON Diane F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 40% | 8% | |
| 37 | JAIN Dia | 100% | 12% | - | - | - | - | |
| 38 | MARRELLI Carolina | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.