Dallas Market Center MAIN HALL - Dallas, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YANG Zeph | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% |
| 2 | TEVEBAUGH Mason C. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 3 | MANGAN Hunter | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 3 | ORTIZ BETANCOURT Yoshua | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 43% |
| 5 | ABBONDANZIO David R. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
| 6 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 7 | PEREZ Daniel | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 8 | VAUGHN Matthew (Manny) E. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 11% |
| 9 | QIAN Irvine | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 7% |
| 10 | ELLISOR Drayten | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 11 | GOODMAN Benjamin | 12% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | < 1% | - |
| 12 | TIEMANN Landen | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 4% |
| 13 | COHEN Nathan | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 14 | SATHYAN Dev | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 15 | SOOS Whitman | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 16 | DADE MAXIMUS | 6% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 17 | WOODALL Ian L. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% |
| 18 | NIXON Scott | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 42% | 12% | |
| 19 | OLSON Joseph | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 20 | WELDON Marten | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 21 | KARIDIS-SCHNEIDER Samuel | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 22 | HORD Jacob | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 23 | TUMULA Arihaan | 7% | 35% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 24 | KASKAN Peter E. | - | 5% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 25 | KUANG Aaron | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 26 | WINKLER Michael | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
| 27 | POHL Philip | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 28 | ADKINS Daniel R. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
| 29 | FISCHER Maximilien | 6% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 30 | PEI Suyang | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 31 | VILLAREAL Quentin | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 32 | TALLEY Blake | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | CHANG Frederic | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 34 | PATEL Avi S. | 3% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 35 | SMITH Samuel J. | 1% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 36 | DANIELL Steven J. | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | ERTEL Mark C. | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 38 | LANG Apollo | 48% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 39 | GERRICK Aaron | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 39 | LI Nathan | 46% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 41 | SEYMOUR Phoenix | 46% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.