Dallas Market Center MAIN HALL - Dallas, TX, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | YANG Zeph | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 2 | TEVEBAUGH Mason C. | V D V D V D | V V V V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 3 | MANGAN Hunter | V V V V D | V V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 3 | ORTIZ BETANCOURT Yoshua | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 5 | ABBONDANZIO David R. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 6 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | D V V D V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 7 | PEREZ Daniel | V V V D D V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 8 | VAUGHN Matthew (Manny) E. | V D V V V D | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 9 | QIAN Irvine | V V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
| 10 | ELLISOR Drayten | V V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
| 11 | GOODMAN Benjamin | V V D V V V | V D | 1.6 | 5 | +3.4 |
| 12 | TIEMANN Landen | D V D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 13 | COHEN Nathan | D V V D D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 14 | SATHYAN Dev | D V D D V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 15 | SOOS Whitman | V D V V D D | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 16 | DADE MAXIMUS | D V D D V | V V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 17 | WOODALL Ian L. | V V D V V V | D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 18 | NIXON Scott | D V V V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 19 | OLSON Joseph | V V V V D D | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 20 | WELDON Marten | D D V V V V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 21 | KARIDIS-SCHNEIDER Samuel | D V D V V V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 22 | HORD Jacob | V V D V D D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 23 | TUMULA Arihaan | V D V D V D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 24 | KASKAN Peter E. | D V V D V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 25 | KUANG Aaron | V D D V D V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 26 | WINKLER Michael | D V D D V V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 27 | POHL Philip | D D V V D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 28 | ADKINS Daniel R. | V D D D V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 29 | FISCHER Maximilien | V V D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 30 | PEI Suyang | D D V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 31 | VILLAREAL Quentin | D D V D D D | V D | 4.0 | 1 | -3.0 |
| 32 | TALLEY Blake | V D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 33 | CHANG Frederic | D D D V V D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 34 | PATEL Avi S. | V D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 35 | SMITH Samuel J. | D D D V D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 36 | DANIELL Steven J. | D D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 37 | ERTEL Mark C. | D D D D D V | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 38 | LANG Apollo | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 39 | GERRICK Aaron | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 39 | LI Nathan | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 41 | SEYMOUR Phoenix | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.