Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
| 2 | SHINCHUK Daniel | D D D V V V | V V V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 3 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | V V V D V | V V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 3 | GONZALEZ Emilio A. | V V D D V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 5 | KONG Alan | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 6 | MEHAN Nicholas | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 7 | DUCKETT Myles | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 8 | GONG Zihao | D V D V V D | V V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 9 | SU Landon | V V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 6 | +2.7 |
| 10 | HUANG Alex F. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 11 | KUSHKOV Daniel | V V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 12 | HUNG Samuel | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 13 | MEDVINSKY Daniel | V V V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 14 | ALAVE Kyle | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 14 | ZHAO Lucas | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 16 | CLARK Gabriel | V D D V D | V V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 17 | BONETTI Brayden | V V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
| 18 | KOGAN Yelisey L. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 19 | SHU Tony | V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 20 | LIN Philip T. | V V V V D D | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 22 | WAXLER Ryan | V D V V V D | V D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
| 23 | IDRISSI Idris | D V V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 24 | GONG Ziqian | V V D V V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 25 | DA GRACA Tyler | D V V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 26 | TSAO Oliver | V V V D D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 27 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | D D V V D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 28 | AHISHALI Devin | V V D D D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 29 | WITCZAK Mateus | D V V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 30 | WONG Caleb W. | V D D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 31 | CHANG Yuyang | D D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 32 | PATEL Rayn | D D D D D V | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 33 | GRIGORESCU Alexander | V V V D D V | D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
| 34 | NARDINI Nathanael P. | D V D V V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 35 | SUGIURA Samuel | V D V D D V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 36 | MEYERSON Jacob | D D V D V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 37 | VOLVOVSKIY Tim | D V D V V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 38 | LEE Andrew | D V D V V D | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 39 | CLARK Caleb | D V D V V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 40 | WANG Max | V V D D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 41 | YAN William | D D V V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 42 | CHEN Jonathan | V D V D D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 44 | LIGH Checed | D D V D V D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 45 | JUNG Ethan | D D D V D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 46 | LI Aidan | D V D V D D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 47 | KUSHNIR Zack | D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 48 | KENNEDY Dakoda | D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 49 | CUKIERMAN Benjamin | D D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 50 | SHINCHUK Jacob | D D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 51 | OH Aster | V D D D D D | D | 3.6 | 1 | -2.6 |
| 52 | GIMBRERE Alexandre | D V D D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 54 | EYBELMAN Ariel | D D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 55 | DIGIACOMO Dennis G. | D D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 56 | SAKMANN Sebastian | D D D D D D | D | 3.7 | 0 | -3.7 |
| 57 | MORSE Sebastian | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 58 | GUREVICH Benjamin | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 59 | RUSSELL Hudson | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 60 | SULLIVAN Ciaran P. | D D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
| 61 | SARBU Eric | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.