Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
| 2 | SHINCHUK Daniel | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 3 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | |
| 3 | GONZALEZ Emilio A. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 26% |
| 5 | KONG Alan | - | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
| 6 | MEHAN Nicholas | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 11% |
| 7 | DUCKETT Myles | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% | |
| 8 | GONG Zihao | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 9 | SU Landon | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
| 10 | HUANG Alex F. | - | - | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
| 11 | KUSHKOV Daniel | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% |
| 12 | HUNG Samuel | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 41% | 15% |
| 13 | MEDVINSKY Daniel | - | 6% | 28% | 42% | 20% | 3% | |
| 14 | ALAVE Kyle | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 14 | ZHAO Lucas | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 16 | CLARK Gabriel | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% | |
| 17 | BONETTI Brayden | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
| 18 | KOGAN Yelisey L. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 42% | 17% |
| 19 | SHU Tony | - | - | 7% | 34% | 43% | 15% | |
| 20 | LIN Philip T. | 2% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 22 | WAXLER Ryan | 10% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 23 | IDRISSI Idris | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | GONG Ziqian | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
| 25 | DA GRACA Tyler | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
| 26 | TSAO Oliver | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 27 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | 4% | 25% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 28 | AHISHALI Devin | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 29 | WITCZAK Mateus | 1% | 11% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 30 | WONG Caleb W. | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 31 | CHANG Yuyang | 15% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | PATEL Rayn | 16% | 40% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | GRIGORESCU Alexander | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
| 34 | NARDINI Nathanael P. | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 35 | SUGIURA Samuel | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 36 | MEYERSON Jacob | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 37 | VOLVOVSKIY Tim | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 38 | LEE Andrew | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | CLARK Caleb | - | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 40 | WANG Max | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% | |
| 41 | YAN William | 6% | 32% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 42 | CHEN Jonathan | - | 5% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 44 | LIGH Checed | 32% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | JUNG Ethan | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 46 | LI Aidan | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 47 | KUSHNIR Zack | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | KENNEDY Dakoda | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 49 | CUKIERMAN Benjamin | 4% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 50 | SHINCHUK Jacob | 46% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 51 | OH Aster | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 52 | GIMBRERE Alexandre | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 54 | EYBELMAN Ariel | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 55 | DIGIACOMO Dennis G. | 23% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | SAKMANN Sebastian | < 1% | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
| 57 | MORSE Sebastian | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 58 | GUREVICH Benjamin | 36% | 44% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 59 | RUSSELL Hudson | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 60 | SULLIVAN Ciaran P. | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 61 | SARBU Eric | 31% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.