Nittany Valley Sports Center - State College, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LABBE Kathryn M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 63% | |
2 | NGUYEN Audrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 38% | 7% |
3 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
3 | LU Samantha R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
5 | FLANIGAN Kendra | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 27% | 6% | < 1% |
6 | BARTLETT Lauren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
7 | GRESHAM Sarah L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 51% |
8 | ZHANG Maya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% | 20% |
9 | GRESHAM Rebekah L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 25% |
10 | DAVIS Ashley | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
11 | HAWKINS Sophia | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
12 | SCIBEK Joya | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
13 | MOORE Mary | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
14 | WILLIAMS WRIGHT Kayla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% |
15 | VENKATA REDDY Parinitha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 19% |
16 | LAI Angel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 35% | 11% | 2% |
17 | VASILYEVA Nadia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
18 | NASON Amelia | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
19 | LIU Sydney | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
20 | WELBORN Kathrina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 3% |
20 | SHAHRIL Natalia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 8% |
22 | CHOI Yoonyoung | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 20% |
23 | LIN Julia L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 4% |
24 | SZALA-KROTKOV Kirsten A. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
25 | HAU Olivia | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
26 | AZIMI Ariana | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
27 | AKPAN Worship | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 45% | 13% |
28 | JHA Ritika | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 12% | |
29 | CANNEY Lauren | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
30 | LABBE Audrey R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
31 | TOP Melek | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
32 | SAINT-PHARD Shana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 10% |
33 | LI Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
34 | ALDORT Isabel | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | < 1% | - |
35 | PILON Isabella | 100% | 94% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | |
36 | CHIANG Sydney | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 22% |
37 | EGBUCHULAM Ugonna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 8% |
38 | ELLIS Marwa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
39 | NA Ashley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
40 | PELILLO Devyn | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
41 | LU Annie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
42 | GORMAN Simone | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | < 1% | - | - |
43 | FERNANDEZ Vivian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
44 | WATTS Reganne M. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
45 | GUPTA Arishita | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
46 | SIU Maple | 100% | 99% | 84% | 48% | 14% | 2% | |
47 | RODA Thaleia | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
48 | SODERBERG Alix | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
49 | KWOK Ella | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
50 | SIVRI Ayla | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 21% | 2% |
51 | SHEN Feiyang | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 9% |
52 | KUANG Yiqi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 9% |
53 | BYBEE Lucy J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
54 | BEZHANI Fiona | 100% | 89% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
55 | AJAMIAN Nika | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
56 | MOWLA Aisha | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
57 | BISHOP Avery | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 5% |
58 | JAIKISHEN Ayanna | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
59 | LIANG Sophia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
60 | MOBERG Rebecca | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
61 | ASBILLE Caya | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 2% | |
62 | ZAKHAROV Anne (Anya) E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
63 | HAWES M (Margaret) | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
64 | BANACH Tehya | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
65 | HAHN Rebecca | 100% | 84% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
66 | COLLINS Hannah | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 4% | - |
67 | KOVARI Kata | 100% | 74% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
68 | HORAN Brenna I. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
69 | TORINO Alyson | 100% | 99% | 86% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
71 | BURNHAM Sarah | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
72 | PATTON Mia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 28% | 4% | - |
73 | BRODSKY Ruth | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
74 | MARKS Abigail | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
75 | NGUYEN Angelina | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
76 | CHOI Ahra | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
77 | CHOI Suin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
78 | HAINES Katherine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 14% | |
79 | LAM Judy | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 3% | - |
80 | KAPPLER Sabrina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 21% | |
81 | GILMORE Lia | 100% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
82 | NOVISS Lakiesha | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
83 | HOFFMAN Ivy | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
84 | FOLLENUS Charlotte | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
85 | EARLY Isabel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% | 6% |
86 | KIM Claire | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
86 | NOLD Eleanor | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
88 | LI Honghua | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
89 | LEUNG Lena | 100% | 97% | 78% | 36% | 6% | - | |
90 | GALLANT Olivia | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 7% | - | |
91 | BOLIG Emma | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 4% |
92 | ANGEL Catalina | 100% | 99% | 86% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - |
93 | TORRES America | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
94 | SMITH Auynha | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - |
95 | LUO Kylie | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
96 | KANTORGERBER Freya | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
97 | PHAM Hailey | 100% | 72% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
97 | ZHUANG Jingfan (Annabel) | 100% | 85% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
99 | MAENG Soyoung | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
100 | DRY Noelle | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 5% | - |
100 | TEIXEIRA Mikayla | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
102 | GAETA Kaitlyn | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
103 | HERRERA Catherine | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
104 | CIULLA Kimberly | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
105 | WU Lighthouse | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
106 | ANGELIDES Gabrielle | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
106 | GEIDEL Brenna | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
108 | KIELTYKA Alexa | 100% | 96% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
109 | LIU Jada | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
110 | WISE Shobi | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - |
111 | SCHROEDER Abigail | 100% | 90% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
111 | AKKALE Reyhan | 100% | 90% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
111 | PONTIFF Audrey | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
114 | CLARK Amethyst | 100% | 93% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
114 | ALSTROM Lillian | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
116 | POOLE Kiley | 100% | 96% | 77% | 45% | 17% | 4% | - |
117 | RAMIREZ Brooklyn | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
117 | BARNES Jordyn | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
119 | UDOV Katerina | 100% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
120 | FISCHMAN Eve | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
120 | RASHID Sitarah Nur | 100% | 96% | 70% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
120 | SIKDER Amena | 100% | 95% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
123 | SHUK Irene | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
124 | WILKINS Barbara | 100% | 95% | 68% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
124 | CRUZ Kaylee | 100% | 88% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.