United State Collegiate Club Championships 2025

Senior Women's Épée

Saturday, April 5, 2025 at 2:30 PM

Nittany Valley Sports Center - State College, PA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LABBE Kathryn M. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 63%
2 NGUYEN Audrey 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 38% 7%
3 BAJAJ Nikita K. 100% 99% 92% 69% 32% 8% 1%
3 LU Samantha R. 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 30% 6%
5 FLANIGAN Kendra 100% 100% 95% 67% 27% 6% < 1%
6 BARTLETT Lauren 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 66% 24%
7 GRESHAM Sarah L. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 51%
8 ZHANG Maya 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 69% 20%
9 GRESHAM Rebekah L. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 80% 25%
10 DAVIS Ashley 100% 99% 92% 69% 36% 10% 1%
11 HAWKINS Sophia 100% 99% 94% 73% 40% 13% 2%
12 SCIBEK Joya 100% 98% 86% 57% 24% 5% -
13 MOORE Mary 100% 96% 77% 42% 12% 2% -
14 WILLIAMS WRIGHT Kayla 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 32%
15 VENKATA REDDY Parinitha 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 62% 19%
16 LAI Angel 100% 99% 90% 67% 35% 11% 2%
17 VASILYEVA Nadia 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 31% 6%
18 NASON Amelia 100% 99% 94% 75% 43% 15% 2%
19 LIU Sydney 100% 100% 95% 78% 45% 15% 2%
20 WELBORN Kathrina 100% 100% 98% 85% 53% 18% 3%
20 SHAHRIL Natalia 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 44% 8%
22 CHOI Yoonyoung 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 20%
23 LIN Julia L. 100% 100% 100% 96% 75% 35% 4%
24 SZALA-KROTKOV Kirsten A. 100% 98% 83% 51% 20% 4% -
25 HAU Olivia 100% 99% 95% 78% 47% 17% 3%
26 AZIMI Ariana 100% 98% 82% 46% 15% 2% -
27 AKPAN Worship 100% 100% 99% 94% 77% 45% 13%
28 JHA Ritika 100% 100% 98% 84% 47% 12%
29 CANNEY Lauren 100% 99% 94% 72% 36% 8% 1%
30 LABBE Audrey R. 100% 100% 98% 88% 61% 26% 5%
31 TOP Melek 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 38% 9%
32 SAINT-PHARD Shana 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 42% 10%
33 LI Charlotte 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 35% 7%
34 ALDORT Isabel 100% 62% 20% 3% - < 1% -
35 PILON Isabella 100% 94% 56% 16% 2% -
36 CHIANG Sydney 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 61% 22%
37 EGBUCHULAM Ugonna 100% 100% 99% 93% 72% 37% 8%
38 ELLIS Marwa 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 76% 34%
39 NA Ashley 100% 100% 99% 93% 73% 38% 9%
40 PELILLO Devyn 100% 91% 61% 25% 6% 1% -
41 LU Annie 100% 100% 98% 87% 59% 24% 4%
42 GORMAN Simone 100% 59% 18% 3% < 1% - -
43 FERNANDEZ Vivian 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 51% 14%
44 WATTS Reganne M. 100% 98% 85% 53% 20% 4% -
45 GUPTA Arishita 100% 92% 64% 29% 7% 1% -
46 SIU Maple 100% 99% 84% 48% 14% 2%
47 RODA Thaleia 100% 88% 54% 20% 4% - -
48 SODERBERG Alix 100% 100% 97% 84% 53% 19% 3%
49 KWOK Ella 100% 100% 98% 83% 50% 15% 1%
50 SIVRI Ayla 100% 100% 99% 90% 60% 21% 2%
51 SHEN Feiyang 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 37% 9%
52 KUANG Yiqi 100% 100% 99% 92% 71% 36% 9%
53 BYBEE Lucy J. 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 54% 17%
54 BEZHANI Fiona 100% 89% 54% 19% 3% - -
55 AJAMIAN Nika 100% 100% 98% 85% 54% 18% 2%
56 MOWLA Aisha 100% 100% 97% 85% 55% 21% 3%
57 BISHOP Avery 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 30% 5%
58 JAIKISHEN Ayanna 100% 96% 77% 44% 15% 3% -
59 LIANG Sophia 100% 100% 97% 82% 49% 15% 2%
60 MOBERG Rebecca 100% 99% 90% 63% 27% 6% -
61 ASBILLE Caya 100% 99% 87% 56% 20% 2%
62 ZAKHAROV Anne (Anya) E. 100% 100% 95% 76% 41% 13% 2%
63 HAWES M (Margaret) 100% 99% 92% 71% 38% 12% 2%
64 BANACH Tehya 100% 98% 83% 50% 19% 4% -
65 HAHN Rebecca 100% 84% 38% 8% 1% - -
66 COLLINS Hannah 100% 100% 93% 65% 25% 4% -
67 KOVARI Kata 100% 74% 29% 6% - -
68 HORAN Brenna I. 100% 97% 78% 42% 13% 2% -
69 TORINO Alyson 100% 99% 86% 57% 25% 6% 1%
71 BURNHAM Sarah 100% 93% 63% 24% 4% - -
72 PATTON Mia 100% 100% 96% 72% 28% 4% -
73 BRODSKY Ruth 100% 100% 95% 78% 47% 17% 3%
74 MARKS Abigail 100% 99% 90% 64% 29% 7% 1%
75 NGUYEN Angelina 100% 100% 97% 81% 46% 13% 1%
76 CHOI Ahra 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 37% 8%
77 CHOI Suin 100% 100% 97% 82% 52% 19% 3%
78 HAINES Katherine 100% 100% 99% 90% 58% 14%
79 LAM Judy 100% 99% 92% 62% 23% 3% -
80 KAPPLER Sabrina 100% 100% 99% 93% 65% 21%
81 GILMORE Lia 100% 49% 12% 1% - - -
82 NOVISS Lakiesha 100% 92% 66% 31% 8% 1% -
83 HOFFMAN Ivy 100% 94% 68% 31% 7% 1% -
84 FOLLENUS Charlotte 100% 98% 84% 52% 20% 4% -
85 EARLY Isabel 100% 100% 100% 95% 75% 33% 6%
86 KIM Claire 100% 100% 97% 84% 54% 20% 3%
86 NOLD Eleanor 100% 99% 93% 72% 37% 11% 1%
88 LI Honghua 100% 99% 90% 66% 33% 10% 1%
89 LEUNG Lena 100% 97% 78% 36% 6% -
90 GALLANT Olivia 100% 97% 78% 39% 7% -
91 BOLIG Emma 100% 100% 99% 92% 66% 28% 4%
92 ANGEL Catalina 100% 99% 86% 46% 12% 1% -
93 TORRES America 100% 98% 84% 53% 20% 4% -
94 SMITH Auynha 100% 99% 87% 55% 18% 3% -
95 LUO Kylie 100% 88% 53% 18% 3% -
96 KANTORGERBER Freya 100% 97% 79% 45% 15% 2% -
97 PHAM Hailey 100% 72% 31% 8% 1% - -
97 ZHUANG Jingfan (Annabel) 100% 85% 50% 19% 4% - -
99 MAENG Soyoung 100% 98% 87% 60% 27% 7% 1%
100 DRY Noelle 100% 98% 88% 60% 26% 5% -
100 TEIXEIRA Mikayla 100% 100% 94% 72% 35% 9% 1%
102 GAETA Kaitlyn 100% 92% 65% 31% 9% 1% -
103 HERRERA Catherine 100% 97% 78% 43% 14% 2% -
104 CIULLA Kimberly 100% 100% 94% 71% 34% 9% 1%
105 WU Lighthouse 100% 97% 78% 41% 12% 2% -
106 ANGELIDES Gabrielle 100% 90% 57% 21% 4% - -
106 GEIDEL Brenna 100% 98% 87% 60% 28% 7% 1%
108 KIELTYKA Alexa 100% 96% 67% 26% 5% - -
109 LIU Jada 100% 99% 90% 67% 33% 9% 1%
110 WISE Shobi 100% 99% 87% 55% 20% 3% -
111 SCHROEDER Abigail 100% 90% 40% 8% 1% - -
111 AKKALE Reyhan 100% 90% 61% 27% 7% 1% -
111 PONTIFF Audrey 100% 96% 79% 46% 16% 3% -
114 CLARK Amethyst 100% 93% 67% 34% 10% 2% -
114 ALSTROM Lillian 100% 54% 13% 1% - - -
116 POOLE Kiley 100% 96% 77% 45% 17% 4% -
117 RAMIREZ Brooklyn 100% 56% 15% 2% - -
117 BARNES Jordyn 100% 95% 72% 37% 11% 2% -
119 UDOV Katerina 100% 92% 65% 28% 6% - -
120 FISCHMAN Eve 100% 96% 73% 34% 9% 1% -
120 RASHID Sitarah Nur 100% 96% 70% 29% 5% - -
120 SIKDER Amena 100% 95% 66% 26% 5% - -
123 SHUK Irene 100% 96% 77% 42% 14% 2% -
124 WILKINS Barbara 100% 95% 68% 28% 5% - -
124 CRUZ Kaylee 100% 88% 51% 16% 3% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.