University of Arizona - Tucson, AZ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
2 | BOYCE Samuel H. | V V V V D V | V V V V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
3 | YAN Ho Lam | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
3 | RITTER Clayton | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
5 | KARAMAGA Ganza | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
6 | SANKEY Levi | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
7 | ISHERWOOD Bryan C. | V V V V D V | V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
8 | CHOY LeeAnn | V V V V D V | V V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
9 | BALDWIN Alexander | V V V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
10 | FOWLER James A. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
11 | BRECHTEL James | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
12 | TIEMANN Landen | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
13 | SANKEY Luka | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
14 | YAN Wing Yu | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
15 | COLLINS Vernon | D V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
16 | FOISSET Jacob | V V V D V D | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
17 | WILLIAMS Timothy | V V V D V V | V D | 2.4 | 5 | +2.6 |
18 | WALLIS Wyatt | V D V V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
19 | HERRON Jonathan | V D V V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
20 | MANDEL Christian | D V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
21 | VENET Téva | D D V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
22 | PUTTAMRAJU Nikhil | V V D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
23 | LAURSEN Logan | V D V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
24 | ORELUP Austin | V D V D D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
25 | CONWAY Collin | D V D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
25 | LOUIE Joseph | V V D D D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
27 | DAVIS Julia | V V D V D D | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
28 | SCHWENK Cody D. | D V V D D V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
28 | PABLO Jesse | V V D D V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
30 | PABLO Sebastian | D V D V V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
31 | CHENOWETH Zachary | D V D V D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
32 | DUNCAN Nicholas | D D D D D V | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
33 | FESTIN Michael G. | V V V V D V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
34 | SMITH Samuel J. | D D V V V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
35 | HOWIE Ryan | V D D V V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
36 | IRVING David | V D D D V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
37 | HEWITT Frank F. | V V D D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
38 | ROLDAN Ethan | D V D D D V | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
39 | BLUM Chaston | V D D V D D | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
40 | SANDIRI Shanmukh Rishith | D D D V D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
41 | ANDERSON Donald | D D V D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
42 | BEATY Trace | D D V V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
43 | MARIKOS Christina | D D V D D V | D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
44 | WOLCOTT Charlie A. | D D V D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
45 | RUVALCABA jesus | V D D D V D | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
46 | MORGAN Elijah | D V V D D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
47 | FELDMAN Louis | D V D D D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
48 | EASTWOOD Darin | D D V D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
49 | CHAIRES Ryan | D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
50 | NUNEZ Alexa | D D D D V D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
51 | WHITAKER Lauren | D V D D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
52 | BARVICK Kathleen | D D D D V D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
53 | REYES genesis | D D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
54 | CHEN Yuan | D D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
55 | PACHECO Ethaniel | D D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
56 | TAARIQ Tanisha | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
57 | KELLEHER Cash | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
58 | RAMIREZ danika | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
59 | CAVAZOS Sophia | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
60 | TORRES Jacquelyn | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
61 | LABANT sophia | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
62 | SANTACRUZ Alejandra | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.