Candlewood Fencing Center - Newtown, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | STAMIS Kyle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% |
2 | LEVIN Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 83% | 42% | 9% | |
3 | WEISS Toby | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 36% | 7% | |
3 | SWIFT Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
5 | LORENZ Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 47% | |
6 | WANG Theodore | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 2% |
7 | FOGG Zachary | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
8 | WASCO Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 85% | 45% | 10% | |
9 | HELD Lev | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 23% | 3% | |
10 | KOCKELMAN Zeno | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 6% |
11 | QUAIL Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
12 | SOKOLOV Lucas | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
13 | FIROOZI Sam | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
14 | DZIALO George A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
15 | QASBA Rudrh | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
16 | HOWARD Demani | 100% | 99% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
17 | CONG Mason | 100% | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
18 | GUPTA Arav | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - |
19 | MCCALL Aidan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 13% | |
20 | EDUSA Leilani | 100% | 90% | 31% | 4% | - | - | |
21 | HOWARD Seren | 100% | 64% | 9% | - | - | - | |
22 | YEHE-NARA William | 100% | 99% | 61% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
23 | BRANDON Em | 100% | 100% | 86% | 45% | 10% | - | |
24 | MCGLYNN Mary | 100% | 17% | - | - | - | - | |
25 | KELLEHER Shannon | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
26 | SIZER Courtney | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.