Division 1/Para Championships + April NAC

Div I Women's Saber

Friday, April 11, 2025 at 1:30 PM

Los Angeles Convention Center - Los Angeles, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 70%
2 POSSICK Lola P. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 70%
3 ANDRES Charmaine G. 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 46%
3 KOVACS Sophia 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 77%
5 SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 91%
6 LU Vivian Y. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 53%
7 TSUI Natalie 100% 100% 99% 95% 78% 44% 11%
8 ZHANG XUANYI 100% 100% 99% 91% 68% 34% 8%
9 CHAMBERLAIN Maia C. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 72%
10 ANTHONY Alexia B. 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 39% 9%
11 NATH Trisha 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 37% 2%
12 JUNG Irene 100% 100% 99% 89% 59% 19%
13 MALEK Zolie 100% 99% 91% 65% 27% 4%
14 JEONG Katie 100% 98% 85% 51% 16% 2%
15 FEIG Sela 100% 100% 98% 87% 60% 27% 5%
15 GHAYALOD reya 100% 99% 92% 67% 29% 6% -
17 HILD Nisha 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 26%
18 KHAN Alissa 100% 98% 86% 57% 23% 5% -
19 FAVO Isabella 100% 95% 70% 31% 7% 1%
20 FESTA Carina 100% 100% 97% 82% 44% 10%
21 VADASZ Ibla P. 100% 100% 97% 82% 45% 10%
22 KIM Marley I. 100% 98% 83% 44% 7%
23 MIKA Veronica 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 38%
24 SCHMIDT Isabel 100% 100% 98% 86% 57% 21% 2%
25 MANN Sophia J. 100% 100% 96% 79% 45% 13% 1%
25 ZOLLER Noelle 100% 91% 59% 23% 4% - -
27 SHEARER Natalie E. 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 35%
28 BEVACQUA Aria F. 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 38% 8%
29 YOUNG Charlotte G. 100% 99% 90% 65% 30% 7% -
30 PAUL Lila 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 27%
31 LEOU Korina 100% 86% 49% 15% 2% -
32 MEDVINSKY Alexandra 100% 94% 72% 38% 12% 2% -
33 WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 62%
34 ATTIA Jasmine 100% 93% 63% 21% 2%
35 HUAI Delilah 100% 100% 95% 73% 33% 6%
36 LAURI Keira 100% 99% 86% 53% 19% 3% -
37 FERNANDEZ Martina 100% 100% 97% 84% 56% 23% 4%
38 GAUTAM Sahana 100% 98% 85% 55% 24% 6% 1%
39 STAPLETON Lindsay K. 100% 100% 99% 91% 67% 30% 5%
40 KER Grace 100% 100% 97% 82% 49% 15% 2%
41 LIGH Erenei J. 100% 99% 93% 71% 33% 6%
42 LEE Hannah 100% 100% 99% 90% 61% 19%
43 LIU Sydney 100% 99% 92% 69% 34% 8% -
44 ZENG Sarah 100% 99% 89% 63% 30% 8% 1%
45 TSE Angelina 100% 100% 95% 75% 40% 12% 1%
45 MAKLIN Sofia 100% 98% 86% 54% 18% 2% -
47 WANG Callie 100% 97% 81% 50% 20% 4% -
48 TONG Kunling 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 44% 6%
49 LIU Hannah 100% 93% 67% 29% 6% 1% -
50 MCKEE Brynnley 100% 100% 97% 82% 45% 10%
51 LIU Sophie 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 39%
52 WEI JoyAnn 100% 96% 72% 31% 6% 1%
53 DAI Olivia 100% 93% 62% 24% 4% -
54 SHEALY Maggie 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 50%
55 CHIARELLI Valentina 100% 100% 97% 84% 50% 13% -
56 HSU Leah 100% 93% 66% 31% 8% 1% -
57 OISHI Megumi 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 58% 10%
58 WANG yining 100% 98% 86% 56% 23% 5% -
59 LEE Alyson 100% 90% 58% 22% 5% - -
60 LI Alexis 100% 88% 49% 15% 2% - -
61 GUGALA Hanna 100% 99% 92% 69% 34% 8% -
62 WANG Gloria Ruoyan 100% 97% 82% 50% 19% 4% -
63 DELSOIN Chelsea C. 100% 100% 99% 93% 59%
64 CHEN Elaine 100% 77% 34% 8% 1% -
65 WANG Elysia 100% 100% 95% 75% 37% 8%
66 BOIS Adele 100% 100% 98% 87% 52% 14%
67 CHAN Jolene 100% 95% 75% 41% 14% 2% -
68 YANG Angelina LeLe 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 55% 18%
69 FUNG Iris 100% 83% 45% 13% 2% - -
70 SAYLES Nina R. 100% 100% 100% 94% 70% 26%
71 DHAR Rana 100% 80% 38% 9% 1% -
72 DONG Angel 100% 86% 50% 16% 2% -
73 MACKAY Katherine 100% 94% 69% 31% 7% 1%
74 DANTULURI Shalini 100% 94% 67% 28% 6% -
75 LU Elaine 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 29% 3%
76 JOHNSON Dagny L. 100% 100% 95% 74% 38% 10% 1%
77 VINOGOROVA Sofiia 100% 98% 87% 59% 25% 5% -
78 JOHNSON Lydia 100% 99% 91% 63% 26% 5% -
79 GOLOVITSER Maya 100% 93% 64% 26% 6% 1% -
80 NAYAK Esha 100% 82% 44% 14% 3% - -
80 YANG Lea 100% 98% 88% 63% 29% 7% 1%
82 PANTALEON-MAZOLA Amari 100% 98% 88% 59% 25% 5% -
83 MUND Ruth 100% 98% 85% 55% 23% 5% -
84 SHI Cathleen 100% 100% 98% 90% 67% 33% 7%
85 LIN Elaine 100% 77% 33% 6% -
86 BARROSO Isabela 100% 89% 58% 23% 5% 1% -
87 TAN Adelyn 100% 95% 69% 31% 7% 1% -
88 HUANG Rachael 100% 95% 71% 34% 8% 1% -
88 CONG Anne 100% 94% 70% 36% 11% 2% -
90 LOMOTAN Addison 100% 88% 56% 22% 5% - -
91 WONG Natalie 100% 83% 45% 14% 2% -
92 COLTER Aurora 100% 92% 64% 26% 5% -
93 KIM Satie 100% 62% 20% 3% - -
94 MARTURANO Bridget H. 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 28% 5%
95 BUSH Bethany 100% 83% 46% 16% 3% - -
96 FEARNS Zara A. 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 31% 4%
97 CASTELO Soleil 100% 53% 14% 2% - - -
98 ALFARACHE Gabriella C. 100% 98% 86% 55% 20% 3% -
98 CHAVAN Arya 100% 93% 69% 34% 10% 2% -
100 SCHAIBLE Sofia L. 100% 88% 57% 23% 6% 1% -
100 SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. 100% 100% 99% 95% 79% 46% 13%
100 DHAR Layla 100% 97% 80% 48% 17% 3% -
103 NGUYEN Siena 100% 98% 84% 55% 23% 5% 1%
104 TABANGAY Heartlyn 100% 99% 93% 69% 31% 5% -
105 CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. 100% 98% 87% 56% 20% 3% -
106 OCA Merci 100% 66% 23% 4% - - -
107 MERCHANT Aishwarya 100% 95% 70% 33% 8% 1% -
108 WALLER London 100% 85% 48% 15% 2% - -
109 SCOTT Eve 100% 99% 89% 62% 27% 6% -
110 LIU kai yin aria 100% 72% 27% 5% - -
111 VESTEL Mira B. 100% 100% 99% 90% 60% 19%
112 CHOI Charlotte 100% 80% 38% 10% 1% -
113 ERIKSON Kira R. 100% 100% 99% 93% 73% 37% 9%
113 BUHAY Kirsten M. 100% 80% 43% 14% 3% - -
113 WANG Jiayi 100% 78% 38% 10% 1% - -
116 LIN Nicole 100% 99% 94% 76% 44% 15% 2%
116 NG Sophia 100% 71% 29% 7% 1% - -
118 DAMBAL Sasha 100% 91% 61% 24% 4% - -
119 CALLAHAN Chase J. 100% 99% 90% 62% 26% 5% -
120 MOZHAEVA MARIA 100% 100% 99% 91% 66% 27% 4%
121 LEI Zitong (Meya) 100% 90% 59% 24% 5% 1% -
122 LIM Jaslene 100% 99% 94% 72% 37% 10% 1%
123 LO Chloe 100% 88% 53% 18% 3% - -
124 XU Emily T. 100% 84% 45% 13% 2% -
124 HAMMERSTROM Aria 100% 91% 58% 20% 3% -
124 XIONG Haojiao 100% 99% 88% 57% 20% 3%
127 HALPERIN Elizabeth H. 100% 87% 51% 17% 3% -
128 XIE Nora 100% 78% 35% 7% -
129 DIECK Miranda P. 100% 84% 47% 14% 2% - -
130 YUEN Nicole 100% 77% 33% 7% 1% -
131 UEMOTO Lynn 100% 54% 13% 2% - - -
132 HU Michelle 100% 95% 75% 41% 14% 2% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.