Los Angeles Convention Center - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LUKASHENKO Darii | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 51% |
| 2 | SARON Mitchell S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% |
| 3 | DERSHWITZ Eli R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% |
| 3 | DENNER Max P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 11% |
| 5 | ESCUETA Tony V. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% | 1% |
| 6 | YEN Darren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% |
| 7 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% |
| 8 | SKEETE Kamar A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 28% |
| 9 | LILOV Neil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 50% |
| 10 | CALLAHAN Jaden P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
| 11 | CHTERENTAL Alex | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 12 | WANG Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 13 | HOMER Daryl D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% |
| 14 | WANG Robert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | 7% |
| 15 | BURGUNDER Quinten (Quin) A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 24% |
| 16 | THOMPSON Khalil A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% |
| 17 | KIM Shaun M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 18 | CHOI Silas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 28% |
| 19 | WILLIAMS Grant W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 72% |
| 20 | HOLZ Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 11% |
| 21 | TE VELDE Noah C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% |
| 22 | SHOMAN Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% |
| 23 | HONG Rubin | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 24 | ATANASSOV Vasil V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 16% | |
| 25 | QIU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 26 | OH Triton | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 27 | LI Howard | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 28 | PATEL Rayn | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 29 | KANG Evan R. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 30 | TSE Aiden J | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | PASTORE LIU Vince | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 32 | WITEK Bernard J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 13% |
| 33 | BAE Jason I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 30% | 3% |
| 34 | CHEONG Heonjun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 11% |
| 35 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 36 | KIM Shawn J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
| 37 | HJERPE Wade H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 24% | 1% |
| 38 | ROBERTS Sam | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | |
| 39 | KUSHKOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% | |
| 40 | ZHAO Zhiyu(Yogi) | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 41 | KILARI Krish | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 42 | TAO Jeffrey | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 42 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 44 | ZHAO Lucas | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | KWALWASSER Eric | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 3% |
| 46 | CHOI HYUNSEOK | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 58% | 17% |
| 47 | NG Jonathan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 48 | DENBROEDER Ronald (Mackie) | 100% | 93% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 49 | GUFFEY Christopher | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 50 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% | |
| 51 | LIM William J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
| 52 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 53 | WANG Daniel | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 54 | MIKA Casper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 16% |
| 54 | JOO Jeein | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 56 | SO Hananiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 14% |
| 57 | NADILE Henry V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 26% |
| 58 | HU Chris | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 59 | YAN William | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 60 | KOVALEV Daniil N. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 61 | GONZALEZ Jake | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 62 | BERGER Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 12% |
| 63 | LI Yiwei | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 64 | SHOMAN Noah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% | 1% |
| 65 | LIN Maxim | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 66 | YUN Jaesun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 4% |
| 67 | LEE Aydan J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% | |
| 68 | LIU Kevin | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 69 | CRAIG Samuel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 70 | HUANG Ethan F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 31% | 5% |
| 71 | BERRIO Carter E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
| 72 | ATWOOD Griffin | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 73 | PRIMUS Nazir | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 11% | |
| 74 | BONIFIELD Arthur G. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 4% | |
| 75 | HUANG Alex F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
| 76 | ERMAKOV Semeon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 77 | BOSITA Carson | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 78 | KANG Evan | 100% | 84% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 79 | MEHAN Nicholas | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 80 | KIM ELIJAH | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 81 | CHAVES Matthew J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 2% |
| 81 | IM Tyler | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 83 | MICLAUS Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
| 83 | REN James | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% | 1% |
| 85 | LAUB William | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 86 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 87 | SIERADZKY Dawson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 19% |
| 88 | FREYRE DE ANDRADE Elian R. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 89 | JEFFORDS Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 90 | KIM Kendrick | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 91 | FENG Leo | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% | - |
| 92 | ANDRES Michael | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 92 | LUHAN Zachary | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 92 | CHUNG Connor | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 95 | KATZ Ryan | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 96 | PI Alexander | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 97 | CHOW William T. | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 98 | RIGHTLER Samuel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 99 | YANG Phillip | 100% | 75% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 100 | WANG Samuel | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 101 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 102 | HWANG Jayden | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 103 | SUBA Lucas | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 104 | CONTRACTOR Cyrus | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 104 | KANG Matthew | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 106 | MUNGUIA Nathan | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 107 | SADHU Neiyam | 100% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 108 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Maksymilian A. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 108 | RAMANAN Govind | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 110 | GONG Jerry | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 111 | CAO Oliver | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 112 | BAUER Hank E. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 113 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 91% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 114 | KALPATHY Rohit | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 115 | WESLER Logan A. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 116 | BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 117 | KIM Ethan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 118 | CHON Collin | 100% | 95% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 119 | LINDHOLM Oliver S. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 120 | KIM Theodore | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 121 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 122 | OH Aster | 100% | 69% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 123 | YERRAMILLI Tejas | 100% | 85% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 124 | PAN Alex | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 125 | SIDDIQUI Shayan | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 126 | GHAYALOD ansh | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
| 127 | ANAND Rohan | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 128 | HOLZ Lucas | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 129 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 5% |
| 130 | SCHARDINE James | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 131 | BARRIOS Diego | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 132 | KOVACHEV Martin | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 133 | CHEN Jonathan | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 133 | LI Ayden | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 135 | YAN Kevin | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 136 | WALKER Dalton F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
| 136 | LEE Andrew | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 138 | MEYERSON Jacob | 100% | 92% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 139 | STURGEON Cole | 100% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 140 | DECK Tyson | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 141 | GILSHTEYN Jacob | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 142 | BYON Julian | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 142 | WONG Lucas | 100% | 66% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 144 | WANG William | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 144 | VAID Luke | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 146 | POFF Kainoa | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 147 | SU Landon | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 148 | NARDINI Nathanael P. | 100% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 149 | GAY Jono | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 150 | LIN Philip T. | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 151 | WAXLER Ryan | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 151 | GREMILLION Obadiah | 100% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.