Los Angeles Convention Center - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 81% |
| 2 | PAI Dong-Ying | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% |
| 3 | FLANAGAN James | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 5% | |
| 3 | JUNCO Carlos | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | |
| 5 | JAN Stephen | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 36% |
| 6 | CHO Michael | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 7 | LOPEZ Reynaldo (REY) | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 45% |
| 8 | SIGOUIN Jean-Francois | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 49% |
| 9 | TYSHCHENKO Andrey | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 32% | 6% |
| 10 | HARKINS Craig T. | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 42% | 16% | |
| 11 | KISSINGFORD John F. | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 44% | 15% | |
| 12 | KREIDMAN Michael J. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 43% | 14% |
| 13 | KAIHATSU Edward J. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 44% | 8% |
| 14 | WOOD Alexander W. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 32% | |
| 15 | PAVLOVICH Robert | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 2% |
| 16 | SHEYNKMAN Leon | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 17 | LAWRENCE John W. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% |
| 18 | ESTELL Oscar M. | - | - | - | 6% | 28% | 48% | 18% |
| 18 | KUZMAK Michael J. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | < 1% |
| 20 | TANG Julian | - | - | 2% | 12% | 42% | 45% | |
| 21 | PIMOUTKINE Roustam R. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 45% |
| 22 | LEBLANC Gerald (Jerry) A. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 40% | 10% |
| 23 | VOYIAZIAKIS Emanuel | - | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 6% |
| 24 | GLADNICK Michael J. | 1% | 10% | 36% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 25 | PASHBY Stephen N. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 8% |
| 26 | LANE Mitchell D. | - | 1% | 14% | 38% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 27 | ZHANG Jie | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 28 | ZHAO Zhiyong | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 19% | 3% |
| 29 | ROBINSON Timothy | - | 7% | 36% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 30 | WHARTON David | - | 4% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 31 | DE BARROS CONTI Thibaut | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | MONSEFI Amir | 2% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 1% | |
| 33 | MINOTT Nicolas D. | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 34 | BENNETT Philippe | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 44% |
| 35 | REYNOLDS Adam | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 22% | 2% |
| 36 | MAURIN Michael | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 37 | GREEN Michael C. | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 34% | 9% | |
| 38 | TOMASI John | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | WU Clarence C. | - | - | 6% | 27% | 43% | 21% | 3% |
| 40 | RIFFATERRE Jason | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 41 | BASARABA Greg | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 42 | PATTERSON Jan (Janmon) M. | - | - | 6% | 25% | 42% | 23% | 3% |
| 43 | ZEISS Gary M. | 1% | 8% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 44 | WEMPLE Charles | 91% | 9% | - | < 1% | - | - | - |
| 45 | BHATT Jay | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 46 | CHOY Benedict W. | 33% | 48% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 47 | BORG Daniel | 25% | 47% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 47 | BUCHNER William | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | - |
| 49 | VALENTINE Iain | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
| 50 | BERGER Jamie | 8% | 35% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 51 | POWERS Douglas A. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | - |
| 52 | LEE David S. | 4% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 53 | STOY Patrick | 48% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | 1% | 14% | 39% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 55 | HERNANDEZ Marc A. | 2% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 56 | CHAN Geoffrey | 4% | 58% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 57 | FACCO Giovanni G. | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 58 | PHILLIPS Jasper | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
| 59 | WILBERT Matt | 2% | 18% | 45% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 60 | ORNELAS Polo | 13% | 44% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | FROST Talon | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 62 | CHENG Norman | 21% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | MCGINTY Eli G. | - | 5% | 32% | 44% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 64 | RODRIGUEZ VINCENT | 33% | 48% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 65 | LESNIAK Chuck | 17% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 66 | CHAO Pierre | 20% | 50% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 67 | RUSANOV Oleg | 11% | 61% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 68 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | 30% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 69 | HE Miao | 55% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 70 | MAZZA DDS Daniel (Dan) G. | 68% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 71 | UNGEMAH Joseph | 40% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 72 | KAZIMIROFF Paul B. | < 1% | 9% | 42% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 73 | HOLCOMB Michael | 50% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 74 | NEWELL Tim | 79% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.