Los Angeles Convention Center - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | V D V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.8 | 5 | -0.8 |
2 | PAI Dong-Ying | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
3 | FLANAGAN James | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
3 | JUNCO Carlos | V D D V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
5 | JAN Stephen | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
6 | CHO Michael | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
7 | LOPEZ Reynaldo (REY) | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
8 | SIGOUIN Jean-Francois | V V V V D D | V V V D | 5.4 | 4 | -1.4 |
9 | TYSHCHENKO Andrey | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
10 | HARKINS Craig T. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
11 | KISSINGFORD John F. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
12 | KREIDMAN Michael J. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
13 | KAIHATSU Edward J. | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
14 | WOOD Alexander W. | V V V V D | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
15 | PAVLOVICH Robert | V D V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
16 | SHEYNKMAN Leon | V V D D V | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
17 | LAWRENCE John W. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
18 | ESTELL Oscar M. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
18 | KUZMAK Michael J. | V V V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
20 | TANG Julian | V V V D V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
21 | PIMOUTKINE Roustam R. | D V V V D V | V D | 5.3 | 4 | -1.3 |
22 | LEBLANC Gerald (Jerry) A. | V V D V D V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
23 | VOYIAZIAKIS Emanuel | V V V V D D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
24 | GLADNICK Michael J. | V V D V D V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
25 | PASHBY Stephen N. | D D V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
26 | LANE Mitchell D. | D V D V V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
27 | ZHANG Jie | D D D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
28 | ZHAO Zhiyong | V V V D D D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
29 | ROBINSON Timothy | V D D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
30 | WHARTON David | D V V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
31 | DE BARROS CONTI Thibaut | D D V V D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
32 | MONSEFI Amir | D D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
33 | MINOTT Nicolas D. | D D V V V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
34 | BENNETT Philippe | V D V D V V | D | 5.3 | 4 | -1.3 |
35 | REYNOLDS Adam | V D V D V V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
36 | MAURIN Michael | D V D V V V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
37 | GREEN Michael C. | V D D V V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
38 | TOMASI John | V V D V D | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
39 | WU Clarence C. | D D V V D V | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
40 | RIFFATERRE Jason | V V D D V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
41 | BASARABA Greg | V D V D V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
42 | PATTERSON Jan (Janmon) M. | V D D V D V | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
43 | ZEISS Gary M. | V V D V D D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
44 | WEMPLE Charles | D D V V D V | D | 0.1 | 3 | +2.9 |
45 | BHATT Jay | D V D V V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
46 | CHOY Benedict W. | D V V D D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
47 | BORG Daniel | D V D D D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
47 | BUCHNER William | V D V D D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
49 | VALENTINE Iain | D V V D D D | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
50 | BERGER Jamie | D D V D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
51 | POWERS Douglas A. | D V D D V D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
52 | LEE David S. | V D D V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
53 | STOY Patrick | D V D D D V | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
54 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | D V D D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
55 | HERNANDEZ Marc A. | D V D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
56 | CHAN Geoffrey | V V D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
57 | FACCO Giovanni G. | D D D V D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
58 | PHILLIPS Jasper | D D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
59 | WILBERT Matt | D D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
60 | ORNELAS Polo | D D D V D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
61 | FROST Talon | V D D D D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
62 | CHENG Norman | D D D D V D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
63 | MCGINTY Eli G. | D D D D V D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
64 | RODRIGUEZ VINCENT | D D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
65 | LESNIAK Chuck | D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
66 | CHAO Pierre | D D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
67 | RUSANOV Oleg | D D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
68 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
69 | HE Miao | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
70 | MAZZA DDS Daniel (Dan) G. | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
71 | UNGEMAH Joseph | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
72 | KAZIMIROFF Paul B. | D D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
73 | HOLCOMB Michael | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
74 | NEWELL Tim | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.