Division 1/Para Championships + April NAC

Veteran Men's Épée

Monday, April 14, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Los Angeles Convention Center - Los Angeles, CA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 YAMASAKI Kyle A. V V D V V V V V V V V V V 4.3 5 +0.7
2 LICHTEN Keith H. V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.8 6 +0.2
3 HALLMAN Nicholas (Nick) J. V V D V V D V V V V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
3 MACZIK Adam W. V V V V V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
5 WHEELER Daniel V V V V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
6 GAINES Aaron V D V D V V V V V V D 5.2 4 -1.2
7 DEUCHER Joseph H. D D V V V D V V V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
8 VARNEY John R. V V D D D V V V V V D 4.1 3 -1.1
9 MAKMATOV Vadim V V V V V V V V D 4.4 6 +1.6
10 PHO Eric V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
11 LOEFFLER Carl E. V V V V V V V V D 4.0 6 +2.0
12 YAKIMENKO Andrei D V V V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
13 MAYCHROWITZ Matt V D V V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
14 GORMLEY Robert V V V D V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
15 SPRINGER Michael D V V V V D V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
16 KROGH Daniel (Dan) M. V V D V D D V V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
17 FIEDERLEIN Andrew M. V V V V V V V D 2.9 6 +3.1
18 SNIDER Jeffrey H. V D V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
19 HORAN Sean T. V V V V V D V D 4.5 5 +0.5
20 COETZEE Frans M. V V V V D V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
20 ROBERTS Peter D V V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
22 CHRISTY Peter C. V D V V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
23 FERKO Philip J. V D V V D V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
24 ZUCKER Noah L. V V D V D V V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
25 SPEICHER Eric V. D V D V V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
26 CHENG Thomas D V V V V D V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
27 CARTER Austin L. D D V V V V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
28 MCTIGUE J. Michael V V D D V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
29 HELGE James R. V D V D D V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
30 OLIVERIUS Joseph W. V D V D D V V V D 4.2 3 -1.2
31 KISSINGFORD John F. V D D V D V V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
32 HUGHES Michael D. D D V V D D V V D 2.5 2 -0.5
33 HITCHCOCK David V V V V V V D 4.2 6 +1.8
34 MEHALL Michael V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
35 LEE Tobias (Toby) T. V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
36 LEE Ambrose W. V V V V V V D 4.4 6 +1.6
37 BARREIRO Darren V V D V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
38 CRANOR Erich L. V V V V V D D 5.3 5 -0.3
39 TAYLOR Daryl J. D V V V V V V D 5.0 5 -
40 CLAWSON Brian C. V V V D D V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
41 HUDSON Jeffrey (Jeff) A. D V V V V D V D 5.0 4 -1.0
42 PRIHODKO Andrew V D V V D V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
43 BECK Brian C. D V V D V V V D 2.0 4 +2.0
44 BAXTER Daniel J. V D V V V D V D 4.0 4 -
45 SANTOS Felipe V V D V D V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
46 STOCK Jordan V V V D V D V D 2.4 4 +1.6
47 HUNTER Justin V V D V V D V D 4.0 4 -
48 HILLSTROM Nathan V D D V V V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
49 STEPHAN Jens D D V V D V V D 4.9 3 -1.9
50 STEWART Robert D V V D V D V D 3.2 3 -0.2
51 KURITZ Marc M. D V D V D V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
52 CHEN Steve D D V D V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
53 GREGORY Dean D V D V D V V D 2.3 3 +0.7
54 MARINI Davide D V V D V D V D 2.0 3 +1.0
55 EVANS Allen L. V D V V D D V D 1.7 3 +1.3
56 ROOD Alex V D V D V D V D 3.8 3 -0.8
57 MENDOZA Zandro D D V V D D V D 3.1 2 -1.1
58 PERKA Michael D V D D V D V D 3.4 2 -1.4
59 HARGROVE Charles D V D D D V V D 3.1 2 -1.1
60 SLOAN Ryan V V D D D D V D 1.5 2 +0.5
61 FLINT James E. D D V D D V V D 2.0 2 -
62 MURRAY Stephen D. D V V D D D V D 2.0 2 -
63 SCHNEIDER Charles (Charlie) J. D D V D V D V D 3.7 2 -1.7
64 FERRIERE Thomas D D D D D V V D 1.6 1 -0.6
65 VALENTINE Shem D V V V V D D 1.1 4 +2.9
66 MCNALLY Thomas J. D V D V V V D 1.8 4 +2.2
67 REYNOLDS Adam V D V D V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
68 LOCASALE Nicholas A. V V V D D D 1.8 3 +1.2
69 WHEELER Mark C. D V D V V D D 3.8 3 -0.8
70 PIERRO Roger V D V V D D D 2.5 3 +0.5
71 COX Matthew T. D V V D D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
72 CAMPBELL Kenneth V D D V D V D 2.0 3 +1.0
73 CHIEN William V D V D D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
74 LE DEVEHAT Yannick V V D V D D D 3.6 3 -0.6
75 XUE Chenming V V D D V D D 1.4 3 +1.6
76 SWANSON Dave V D V D D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
77 COLE Matthew D V D D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
78 LIMA Roberto M. V D D D V D D 2.1 2 -0.1
79 KAUFMAN Joel H. D D D V V D D 3.5 2 -1.5
80 KRUGER Mark D D D V D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
81 ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. D D V D V D D 2.6 2 -0.6
82 CHIANG Andrew V V D D D D D 1.4 2 +0.6
83 CLINEFELTER Dennis S. V D D D V D D 2.7 2 -0.7
84 BRUS Brian V. V D D D D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
85 VIEDERMAN Matthew (Matt) V D D D V D D 3.5 2 -1.5
86 SIMMONS Matthew C. V D D D V D D 2.5 2 -0.5
86 BAXTER David D D V D D V D 1.7 2 +0.3
88 KANE Tim D D D V D D 1.7 1 -0.7
89 OZANNE Jeffrey S. D D D V D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
90 MASE James B. D D D D V D D 3.5 1 -2.5
91 REED David D V D D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
92 MINOTT Nicolas D. D D V D D D D 1.0 1 -
93 TKACH Robert W. D V D D D D D 2.3 1 -1.3
94 CHANG Henry D D D D V D D 2.7 1 -1.7
95 LIPP Robert (Bob) J. D V D D D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
96 ALTMAN Jeff H. D D D D V D D 2.9 1 -1.9
96 YI David D D D D D V D 0.2 1 +0.8
98 KLINE R. Jay V D D D D D D 2.6 1 -1.6
99 JEFFCOAT Timothy D V D D D D D 0.7 1 +0.3
100 CHU Brandon A. D D V D D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
100 LANDIS Geoffrey A. D V D D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
102 RESS Michael A. D D D D D D D 3.5 0 -3.5
103 MORALES William D D D D D D D 0.2 0 -0.2
104 GAO "George" Xiaojiang D D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
105 WU Robert D D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
106 CHI Kai-Hung D D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
107 TOMASI John D D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
108 HUANG Jen-Chieh D D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
108 SOKOLOVSKY Boris D D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
110 BRUCE II Ommer E. D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
111 HORN Evans D D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.