Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Kyle P. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 77% |
| 2 | CHEN Hanson | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 47% | 42% |
| 3 | CHEN Nuo | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 3 | SALEH Omar | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 17% |
| 5 | ZHENG Marcus | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
| 6 | XIE Jicheng | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | |
| 7 | HUANG Holmes (Shengheng) | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% | |
| 8 | MARTIRE Luca | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 9 | SIMONOV Timofey | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 53% |
| 10 | LI Richard | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
| 11 | LU Andy | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 43% | 15% |
| 12 | WONG Jacob W. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 3% |
| 13 | CHEN Ethan | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 36% |
| 14 | CHEN mitchell lixuan | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 50% | 32% |
| 15 | BAKSHI Aman | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 16 | BELCHAMBER Mason | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 17 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 41% |
| 18 | CHO Jadon Yushin | - | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% |
| 19 | JIMENEZ Naveen | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 42% |
| 20 | HART-SYED declan | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
| 21 | WANG Rory | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 36% |
| 22 | MARISI Gabriel | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 33% | 4% |
| 22 | SUSANTO William | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 24 | CHENG Logan | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 31% |
| 25 | LEE Charles T | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 4% |
| 26 | HOU Gaven | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 27 | HUA Aaron | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 40% | 16% |
| 28 | SUN Henry | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 29 | WEI Winston | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 30 | YEVDAYEV Tamir | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 32 | KIAYIAS Alexander | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 33 | ZHANG GAVIN J | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 34 | MAO Lucas | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
| 35 | SENANI Arjun | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 23% | 4% |
| 36 | CAO Justin | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 37 | WAYBRIGHT Matteo | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 38 | ZENG Rick | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
| 39 | LAO Kevin | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 39 | ONIK Ari N. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 41 | LIU Aaron | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 42 | KWON Chase | 2% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | DIAZ Gabriel | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 44 | HUYNH Matthew | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 45 | JABLOKOV Roman | 9% | 37% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | CHA James | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% | |
| 47 | HAN Alexander | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
| 48 | CHUN Zachary | 2% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 49 | TSAY Jordan R. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 31% | 3% |
| 50 | WEI JR Shan | - | 4% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 51 | YANG David H. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 52 | BAI Austin | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 53 | PLUMMER Waylon | - | 2% | 20% | 44% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 54 | KOVACS Harrison | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 54 | TANG Royce | - | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 56 | TOOMRE Kai | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 2% |
| 57 | ZHANG Hanru | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 2% |
| 58 | CHO Xzander | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 59 | KINGSLEY Griffin | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 60 | GRUNENWALD Henri | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 61 | KUO Phineas | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 62 | ZHANG Julian | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 63 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 64 | QU Zhida (richard) | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 65 | ZHENG Austin | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | < 1% | - |
| 66 | HOLMES Alexiy | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 67 | PETINO Leonardo | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 68 | CHANG Parker | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
| 69 | JIN Andy | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 70 | DAO-CRESPO Joaquin | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 71 | KAYE Ben | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | QIAN Zekai | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 73 | ZHENG Christopher | 13% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 74 | HU Daniel | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 75 | CHOI Hunter | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 76 | GODIN Willis | 2% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 77 | LEE Thomas | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 78 | SHANNON Jack | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 5% |
| 79 | O'LEARY Colin | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 80 | PAN Howard Haoran | 8% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 81 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | 1% | 13% | 45% | 33% | 8% | - | - |
| 82 | GATES Combustion | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 83 | CAO Joshua | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 84 | CHANG Zane | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 85 | KIM Ewan | 25% | 44% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 86 | BLACK Henry | 39% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 87 | BAGRINTSEV Nicholas | 13% | 40% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 88 | CHANG Xavier | 5% | 49% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 89 | XU Ryan | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 90 | LI Jayden | 2% | 14% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 90 | BAS Jonathan | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 92 | ZHANG Ethan | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 92 | FAN Sean | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 94 | HUANG Jinyao | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 95 | KRZYWON Dylan | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 96 | ZHANG Ethan | 29% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 97 | SMITH Colin | 23% | 53% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 98 | WANG Xicheng | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 99 | MCCARTHY Hudson | 15% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 100 | CHENG Andrew | 55% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 101 | KIM Daniel | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 102 | SHAW Spencer | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 103 | BRADFORD-WATT Ezra | 57% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 104 | GONZALEZ DE COSIO ALVAREZ Iker | 48% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 105 | BRENNER Samuel | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 106 | REN Ryan | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 106 | WU Ryan | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 106 | HUANG Dikang | 13% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 109 | LIANG Haojia | 26% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 110 | LINGAMPALLI Sashank | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.