Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | REN Katherine | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 2 | XU Elaine | - | - | - | 3% | 22% | 59% | 16% |
| 3 | YOUNG Sienna | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 11% |
| 3 | ZHAO Selena | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
| 5 | WANG JiaQi | - | - | - | 4% | 17% | 40% | 39% |
| 6 | HU Heidi | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 22% |
| 7 | WANG MONA | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 3% |
| 8 | NEMORIN Rei | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
| 9 | MULLER Inara | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
| 10 | ZHANG Ashley | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 10 | ILICHEVA Adriana | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 12 | VUDTHITHAMRONG Vivienne | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 13 | YANG Felicia | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 14 | LI Tira | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 35% | 9% |
| 15 | TANG YILUN | - | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% |
| 16 | OLESKY Ellie | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | MALUKI Nia | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 18 | LIU Stephanie | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 19 | PEREIRA Izumi | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 20 | LI Tiffany | - | - | 4% | 14% | 31% | 35% | 15% |
| 21 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 67% | 6% |
| 22 | IORDANOVA Vela | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 23 | CHAU Zoey | - | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 24 | TA-ZHOU Sophia | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 25 | WANG Emily | - | 1% | 8% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 8% |
| 26 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 2% |
| 27 | POWERS Waverly | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 28 | MACHIRAJU Ishita | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 29 | ZHENG Winona | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 13% | 1% |
| 30 | LAU Angela | 4% | 17% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 31 | GUERVILLE Angelique | 1% | 10% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 32 | GU Allison | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 33 | VARAH Alaia | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 8% |
| 34 | KABILING Anika Von Marie | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 35 | WANG Chloe | 2% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 36 | LAMTAN Trinity | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 37 | KONDE Anika | 3% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 38 | MENON Maya | - | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 6% |
| 39 | LEE Elise | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 39 | DANIELS Jordanna | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 3% |
| 41 | AN Jasmine | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 42 | WU Harper | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 43 | ONO Lisa | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 44 | TSIPORUKHA Arie | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 45 | GARCIA RODRIGUEZ Victoria Maria | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 46 | MOFFITT Charlotte | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 47 | CAO Audrey | 3% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 48 | YIN Xizi | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 49 | CHEN Charlotte | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 48% | 25% |
| 50 | JIN Eileen | 6% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 51 | JOSEPH Azalée | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 52 | FENG chloe | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | FREY Elise | 4% | 17% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 54 | WU Abigail | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 55 | PAREEK Aeshna | 19% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | WU Jing | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | LI Gloria | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 58 | RADELL Zoe | 8% | 40% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 59 | BREWSTER Ayaki | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 29% | 3% | - |
| 60 | ARGUELLO Camilla | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 61 | LIANG Katherine | 6% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 62 | ROMEO lia | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 63 | ONG Katherine | 4% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 64 | PUR-RASHID Kiva | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 65 | YI Victoria | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 66 | LIM Charlotte | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 40% | 14% |
| 67 | JUILLERAT Tabea | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 68 | PURITZ Morgan | 16% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 69 | QUIROS Lucia | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 70 | LIU Alyssa | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 71 | PORTNOY Elizabeth | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 72 | OTAZU Clara | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 73 | CHEN Chloe | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 2% |
| 74 | WANG Keira | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 75 | RAGAVENDRAN Hasini | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 76 | CHANG Grace | 11% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 77 | SCHWARTZ Delphine | 1% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 78 | POTDAR Harper | 27% | 40% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 79 | MOSHAROVA Natalia | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 80 | LIM Isabella | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 81 | ARANGO Ivanna | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 81 | EDUSA Nayelli | 24% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 83 | AVDEEV Katherine | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 84 | ATA Emily | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 85 | RAZIANO Collins | 28% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 86 | SARBU Esme | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 87 | GAO Anita | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 88 | MADDISON Estelle | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 89 | DY Azurie | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 90 | KIM Chloe | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 90 | LASS Genevieve | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.