Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | REN Katherine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
2 | XU Elaine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 16% |
3 | YOUNG Sienna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
3 | ZHAO Selena | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
5 | WANG JiaQi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 39% |
6 | HU Heidi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% |
7 | WANG MONA | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 30% | 3% |
8 | NEMORIN Rei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
9 | MULLER Inara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
10 | ZHANG Ashley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
10 | ILICHEVA Adriana | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
12 | VUDTHITHAMRONG Vivienne | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
13 | YANG Felicia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
14 | LI Tira | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 9% |
15 | TANG YILUN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% |
16 | OLESKY Ellie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
17 | MALUKI Nia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 11% |
18 | LIU Stephanie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
19 | PEREIRA Izumi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
20 | LI Tiffany | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
21 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 6% |
22 | IORDANOVA Vela | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
23 | CHAU Zoey | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
24 | TA-ZHOU Sophia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
25 | WANG Emily | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 8% |
26 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 2% |
27 | POWERS Waverly | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
28 | MACHIRAJU Ishita | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - |
29 | ZHENG Winona | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 14% | 1% |
30 | LAU Angela | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
31 | GUERVILLE Angelique | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
32 | GU Allison | 100% | 97% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
33 | VARAH Alaia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 8% |
34 | KABILING Anika Von Marie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
35 | WANG Chloe | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - |
36 | LAMTAN Trinity | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
37 | KONDE Anika | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
38 | MENON Maya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 6% |
39 | LEE Elise | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
39 | DANIELS Jordanna | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
41 | AN Jasmine | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
42 | WU Harper | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
43 | ONO Lisa | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
44 | TSIPORUKHA Arie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
45 | GARCIA RODRIGUEZ Victoria Maria | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
46 | MOFFITT Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
47 | CAO Audrey | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - |
48 | YIN Xizi | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
49 | CHEN Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 25% |
50 | JIN Eileen | 100% | 94% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
51 | JOSEPH Azalée | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
52 | FENG chloe | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
53 | FREY Elise | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
54 | WU Abigail | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
55 | PAREEK Aeshna | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
56 | WU Jing | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
57 | LI Gloria | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
58 | RADELL Zoe | 100% | 92% | 52% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
59 | BREWSTER Ayaki | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 3% | - |
60 | ARGUELLO Camilla | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
61 | LIANG Katherine | 100% | 94% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
62 | ROMEO lia | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 4% | - |
63 | ONG Katherine | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
64 | PUR-RASHID Kiva | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
65 | YI Victoria | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 6% | - |
66 | LIM Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 14% |
67 | JUILLERAT Tabea | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
68 | PURITZ Morgan | 100% | 84% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
69 | QUIROS Lucia | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
70 | LIU Alyssa | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - |
71 | PORTNOY Elizabeth | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
72 | OTAZU Clara | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
73 | CHEN Chloe | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
74 | WANG Keira | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
75 | RAGAVENDRAN Hasini | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
76 | CHANG Grace | 100% | 89% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
77 | SCHWARTZ Delphine | 100% | 99% | 83% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
78 | POTDAR Harper | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
79 | MOSHAROVA Natalia | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
80 | LIM Isabella | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
81 | ARANGO Ivanna | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
81 | EDUSA Nayelli | 100% | 76% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
83 | AVDEEV Katherine | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
84 | ATA Emily | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
85 | RAZIANO Collins | 100% | 72% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
86 | SARBU Esme | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
87 | GAO Anita | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
88 | MADDISON Estelle | 100% | 50% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
89 | DY Azurie | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
90 | KIM Chloe | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
90 | LASS Genevieve | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.