Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FENG Grace | - | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 86% |
| 2 | TSIMIKLIS Aphrodite | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
| 3 | DENG Melissa | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
| 3 | WANG Carol | - | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 74% |
| 5 | MCSHERRY Ava | - | - | - | - | 1% | 19% | 80% |
| 6 | MARISI Gianna | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 74% |
| 7 | LI Han (Helina) | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 36% | 56% |
| 8 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 35% |
| 9 | HARRIS Julia | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 40% | 50% |
| 10 | WU Chingfei Amber | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 46% | 25% |
| 11 | LI Alice | - | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 43% | 11% |
| 12 | DUAN Sophie | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 43% | 44% |
| 13 | JIANG Chloe | - | - | 5% | 24% | 46% | 22% | 3% |
| 14 | ZELDIN Nadia | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 50% | 36% |
| 15 | JOO Natalie | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% |
| 16 | HUSSIAN Annabelle | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 41% | 13% | 1% |
| 17 | XIE Lillian | - | - | - | 3% | 31% | 66% | |
| 18 | WANG Joanna | - | - | - | - | 1% | 21% | 77% |
| 19 | FIELD Elizabeth | - | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 45% | 21% |
| 20 | RIVERA Leahy | - | - | 3% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 7% |
| 21 | PUTHOFF Olivia | - | - | 4% | 29% | 53% | 14% | |
| 22 | KIM Claire | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 43% | 24% |
| 23 | DE CASTRO Kai | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 1% |
| 24 | KRAHE Annika | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 22% |
| 25 | MCFARLANE Asha | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 49% | 23% |
| 25 | JOO Sara | - | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 13% |
| 27 | WANG Amabel | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 49% | 25% |
| 28 | REZA Fukaina | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 29 | LI Joy | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 45% | 34% |
| 30 | BYK Karalina | - | 1% | 19% | 52% | 26% | 2% | |
| 31 | YUAN Agnes | - | - | 4% | 24% | 50% | 20% | 2% |
| 32 | ZHU Alivia | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 33 | MUMMANENI Samyuta | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 49% | 38% |
| 34 | ORRINGER Lottie | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 40% | 20% | 3% |
| 35 | WANG Dina C. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 38% | 4% |
| 36 | MCSHERRY Kayla | - | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 48% | 19% |
| 37 | YIN Chloe | - | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 33% | 4% |
| 38 | HARRIS Parker | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 29% |
| 39 | BO Iris | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 40 | LI Savannah | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 37% | 5% |
| 41 | ZHAO Olivia | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 3% |
| 41 | SHIN Elizabeth | - | - | 4% | 23% | 46% | 25% | 1% |
| 43 | DONG Iris | - | - | 6% | 25% | 44% | 23% | 2% |
| 44 | YACOBUCCI Nadia | - | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 41% | 12% |
| 45 | LIN Yunong | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
| 46 | LLOYD Bianca | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 47 | KIM Claire | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | XING Melly | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
| 49 | PAN Yiran | - | 1% | 8% | 39% | 41% | 11% | - |
| 50 | CHOI Cara | 1% | 12% | 37% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 51 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 36% | 3% |
| 52 | SINGH Evangelina | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 52 | CHO Olivia | - | - | 8% | 38% | 41% | 11% | - |
| 54 | HUANG Sophie | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 52% | 9% |
| 55 | CHAN Jolene | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
| 56 | WANG Annie | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 22% | 3% |
| 57 | KAPRAN Anastasia | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 46% | 39% |
| 58 | HOLLIS Priscillia | 24% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | ZHU Ella | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 60 | MURPHY Genevieve | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 61 | FENG Audrey | - | - | < 1% | 1% | 9% | 38% | 51% |
| 61 | KIM Yuna | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 63 | LUO lucy | 10% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 64 | SUN Nicole | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 65 | COLE Sofia | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 66 | YAO Abby | - | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 48% | 8% |
| 67 | CAO Amelie | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 28% | 3% |
| 68 | YANG Olivia | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 41% | 17% | 1% |
| 69 | PELLE Lia | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 70 | OTTAVIANO Maris | 3% | 24% | 52% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
| 71 | SFINTESCU Emma | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 72 | MACKINTOSH Quinn | 2% | 18% | 54% | 24% | 3% | - | |
| 73 | ZHILKOV Anya | - | 7% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 74 | ZHENG Annalyn | 4% | 21% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 75 | VO Evelyn | 11% | 41% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 76 | DESERANNO Seren | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 77 | HEMPHILL Mia | 6% | 35% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 78 | BAULIN Zoya | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 79 | HUANG Emma | 2% | 17% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 80 | LI Doreen | 21% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 81 | XU Charlene | 3% | 21% | 41% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 82 | LI Christina | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 83 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 84 | XU-FERGUSON Victoria | 3% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 85 | SHEN Gloria | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 86 | STEWART Isla | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 87 | PARK Hannah | 3% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 88 | BENNETT Emi | 4% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - | - |
| 89 | HAFEZ Sahar | 4% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 89 | DONG Katelyn | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 91 | WANG Joann | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 91 | YANG Hanli | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 93 | CHAN Kaitlyn | 12% | 40% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 94 | LIN Claire | 1% | 13% | 37% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 95 | DOUGLAS Addison | 2% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 96 | LENZ Phoebe | 43% | 48% | 9% | - | - | - | |
| 96 | GENG Emma | 4% | 28% | 43% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 98 | GOMEZ Sofia | 12% | 42% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 99 | ALDREDGE Ginny Rebecca | 43% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 100 | SHANG Arianna | 1% | 11% | 34% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 101 | LEO Jenna | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 102 | ZHU Audrey | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 103 | OLAWOYE Jadesola | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 104 | TEE Cymbeline | 10% | 38% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 105 | ZHANG Caroline | 11% | 40% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 106 | HUDSON Sophie | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 106 | DHALIWAL Seerat | 9% | 34% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 108 | ZELDIN Nina | 19% | 54% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 109 | WAN Celine | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 110 | HOU Xu | 1% | 12% | 41% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 111 | KAPUR Vanya | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 112 | PHAN Logan | 2% | 14% | 37% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 113 | JAZWINSKI Ivy | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 114 | REILLY Carys | 21% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 115 | PAEK Mila | 12% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 116 | GOMEZ Amelia | 37% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 116 | LIU Sophia | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 118 | GUSTAFSSON Anna | 61% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 119 | LIANG Jasmine | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 120 | SHI Micah | 27% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 120 | WU Charlotte | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 122 | HUSSAIN Maya | 24% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 122 | SONG Sarah | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 124 | LIU Bella | 5% | 32% | 42% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 125 | PIERSIG Eleanor | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 126 | FAN Melody | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 126 | JUVVADI Aanika | 44% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 128 | KOH Emma | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 129 | PARK Addison | 30% | 49% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 130 | ZUCKER Eleanor | 58% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 130 | LOBO Sophie | 2% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 133 | SEO Celine | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.