CSD YMCA CHARLOTTE - Charlotte, NC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HUTH Jacob | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 47% | 39% | 
| 2 | SMOLICH Marat | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 61% | 4% | 
| 3 | HUTH Mitchell | - | - | - | - | 7% | 93% | |
| 3 | ZAIDI Adil | - | - | - | 10% | 35% | 40% | 14% | 
| 5 | VIVEROS Evan | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 45% | 
| 6 | GRISWOLD Abel B. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% | 
| 7 | MADDOX Lacey E. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 6% | 
| 8 | HARKINS Craig T. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 43% | 38% | 
| 9 | RAMESH prashvin | 1% | 11% | 39% | 38% | 12% | 1% | - | 
| 10 | PRUT Anton | - | 1% | 14% | 44% | 40% | 1% | |
| 11 | HUTH Trevor | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% | 
| 12 | TANG xianchi | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 40% | 12% | 1% | 
| 13 | GADOW Patrick | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | 
| 14 | BROWN Jacob (Jake) G. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% | 
| 15 | VERGARA Jaden Reese | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% | 
| 16 | CANTERO GIGNAC Alexander | - | 6% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | 
| 17 | HARKINS Asher | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - | 
| 18 | YOU Chanmin | - | 5% | 30% | 46% | 18% | - | |
| 19 | LEWIS Jared | - | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 47% | 12% | 
| 20 | VIVEROS Antonio | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% | 
| 21 | DONG Emily | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 4% | 
| 22 | CAO Kayla | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% | 
| 23 | SHEHORN Connor | - | - | 1% | 13% | 37% | 37% | 12% | 
| 24 | MALIK Manha | - | 5% | 33% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | 
| 25 | MONSCH Channing | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 48% | 12% | - | 
| 26 | RILEY Owen | 1% | 12% | 42% | 36% | 9% | - | |
| 27 | BAZZLE Christopher E. | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - | 
| 28 | MONAGHAN Claire (Micah) | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | - | 
| 29 | ZHANG Vicky | 25% | 59% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | 
| 30 | VIVEROS Oscar A. | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - | 
| 31 | SATTERLY Avery | 17% | 40% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - | 
| 32 | CARDINAL Elise | 26% | 46% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - | 
| 33 | MARRELLI Carolina | 48% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 34 | BACA GALO Dereck | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - | 
| 35 | SNYDER Andrew | 27% | 52% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - | 
| 36 | LODGE Dagny | - | 28% | 46% | 23% | 3% | - | - | 
| 37 | NUNN Declan | 23% | 56% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 38 | LAZAREANU Justin | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | - | 
| 39 | DELORME Benjamin | 33% | 46% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - | 
| 40 | PATEL Jay | 29% | 49% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | 
| 41 | JOHNSON Ethan | 42% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - | 
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.