Event Results
Renaissance Fencing Foil TournamentSurprise Map
Green wins and red losses stand out more as the result becomes less expected.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CRADDOCK Matthew | V V V V V | V V V | 2.0 | 5 | +3.0 |
| 2 | SIMONS Henry | V V D V | V V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 3 | PRYOR Ted | D V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 3 | LIPPITT Amelia | V D D V V | V D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
| 5 | PARK Siwoo | V D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 6 | PADRES ZANABONI Dinak | D D V D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 7 | MOORE Samuel | V D D D D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 8 | ZELENOCK Liam | D D D D D | V D | 3.5 | 0 | -3.5 |
| 9 | HARRIS Beckett | V D V D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 10 | SORAGHAN Kiera | D V V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 11 | PHUNG Caitlin | D V V D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| Color | Outcome | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |