| 2025-2026 | 2024-2025 | 2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | Before 2022 | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victories | 5 | 6 | - | - | - | 11 |
| Losses | 9 | 13 | - | - | - | 22 |
| Win Ratio | 35.7% | 31.6% | - | - | - | 33.3% |
| Pool Victories | 4 | 5 | - | - | - | 9 |
| Pool Losses | 7 | 10 | - | - | - | 17 |
| Pool Win Ratio | 36.4% | 33.3% | - | - | - | 34.6% |
| DE Victories | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | 2 |
| DE Losses | 2 | 3 | - | - | - | 5 |
| DE Win Ratio | 33.3% | 25.0% | - | - | - | 28.6% |
Note: Seasons start on August 1st and end on July 31st.
| 2025-2026 | 2024-2025 | 2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | Before 2022 | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Easy wins† | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| Easy wins as % of wins | 20.0% | 0.0% | - | - | - | 9.1% |
| Close wins‡ | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | 3 |
| Close wins as % of all wins | 20.0% | 33.3% | - | - | - | 27.3% |
| Close losses‡ | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | 2 |
| Close losses as % of all losses | 11.1% | 7.7% | - | - | - | 9.1% |
| Big losses† | 6 | 9 | - | - | - | 15 |
| Big losses as % of all losses | 66.7% | 69.2% | - | - | - | 68.2% |
† Easy victories or big losses are those with the score difference of 4 or more touches in a pool, 7 or
more touches in direct elimination, and 5 or more in veteran and youth direct elimination.
‡ Close bouts are those with the score difference of 1 or fewer touches in a pool, 3 or
fewer touches in direct elimination, or 2 or fewer touches in veteran or youth direct elimination.
| 2025-2026 | 2024-2025 | 2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | Before 2022 | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Events | 2 | 3 | - | - | - | 5 |
| Tournaments | 2 | 3 | - | - | - | 5 |
| Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | D | 2:5 | FEEHAN Conor | 14 | D25 | 5 | Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club | 1358 | 1211 | 44.2 | 41% | ||
| Pool | D | 1:5 | MCMILLIAN Harrison | 2 | D25 | 13 | Heartland Fencing Academy | 1775 | 1167 | 19.0 | 17% | ||
| Pool | V | 5:3 | GOLLNICK Brian | 42 | U | 46 | Iowa City Fencing Center | 1176 | 1148 | 47.6 | 48% | ||
| Pool | D | 1:5 | CHASE Crosby | 32 | U | 37 | Grand Rapids Fencing Academy | 975 | 1195 | 60.2 | 64% | ||
| Pool | D | 1:5 | PAYNE Lynas | 41 | U | 24 | Grand Rapids Fencing Academy | 1133 | 1135 | 43.7 | 50% | ||
| Pool | D | 0:5 | ZINSER James | 13 | D25 | 3 | South YEL Fencing Alliance | 1656 | 1092 | 16.7 | 18% | ||
| T64 | D | 14:15 | WANG Freyr | 4 | D25 | 23 | Renaissance Fencing Club | 1467 | 1482 | 168.1 | 51% |
| Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | D | 1:5 | ACURERO GONZÁLEZ Anabella | 1 | A25 | 3 | Wayne State University NCAA | ||||||
| Pool | D | 3:5 | DRIVER Atticus | 12 | E25 | 14 | University Of Michigan Fencing Club | 1206 | 1088 | 57.3 | 43% | ||
| Pool | V | 5:4 | STEMLER Tyler | 13 | E25 | 18 | Bay Regional Fencing Alliance / University Of Michigan Fencing Club | 1292 | 1031 | 85.1 | 35% | ||
| Pool | V | 5:3 | METZ Evan | 21 | U | 10 | Miami University Fencing Ohio / Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy | 1330 | 1116 | 75.5 | 37% | ||
| Pool | V | 5:0 | JACKSON Christopher | 23 | U | 29 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 531 | 1192 | 19.3 | 83% | ||
| T32 | V | 15:11 | IVASKA Mintas | 16 | U | 21 | Robert Morris University Fencing Club | 2500 | 1249 | 266.5 | 13% | ||
| T16 | D | 2:15 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | 2 | A23 | 2 | Wayne State University NCAA | 2558 | 1515 | 33.1 | 7% |
| Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | V | 5:4 | GROSS Stephen R. | 11 | 12 | B23 | 8 | 2420 | 950 | 348.8 | 1% | ||
| Pool | D | 0:5 | DEW Eric | 1 | 1 | B25 | 9 | Halberstadt Fencers' Club | 2600 | 1299 | 6.6 | 2% | |
| Pool | D | 2:5 | PRECCIOZZI Aldo F. | 21 | 22 | E25 | 20 | Space City Fencing Academy | 1826 | 1292 | 40.5 | 21% | |
| Pool | D | 4:5 | DELL George H. | 20 | 32 | D21 | 14 | RedStar Fencing Club Chicago | 2005 | 1252 | 24.4 | 12% | |
| Pool | D | 2:5 | JENKINS Michael | 30 | 52 | U | 28 | Fencers Club Inc. | 723 | 1227 | 133.9 | 78% | |
| Pool | D | 1:5 | LEBLANC Gerald (Jerry) A. | 10 | 11 | B22 | 3 | Elite Fencing Club | 2380 | 1093 | 4.9 | 2% | |
| T32 | D | 0:10 | LEBLANC Gerald (Jerry) A. | 10 | 11 | B22 | 3 | Elite Fencing Club | 2620 | 1269 | 20.3 | 3% |
| Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | D | 1:5 | CRADDOCK Matthew | 1 | U | 1 | Renaissance Fencing Club | 677 | 797 | 178.4 | 56% | ||
| Pool | V | 5:2 | MOORE Samuel | 5 | U | 7 | Renaissance Fencing Club | 1305 | 619 | 233.2 | 18% | ||
| Pool | V | 5:2 | LIPPITT Amelia | 4 | U | 3 | Renaissance Fencing Club | ||||||
| Pool | V | 5:4 | ZELENOCK Liam | 3 | U | 8 | 847 | 852 | 97.8 | 50% | |||
| Pool | V | 5:2 | PHUNG Caitlin | 9 | U | 11 | |||||||
| T8 | V | 15:9 | MOORE Samuel | 5 | U | 7 | Renaissance Fencing Club | 1162 | 1269 | 241.4 | 54% | ||
| T4 | D | 6:15 | SIMONS Henry | 11 | U | 2 | Renaissance Fencing Club | 1533 | 1511 | 241.5 | 49% |
| Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | D | 1:5 | ZMUDA Aiden | 1 | D25 | 3 | West Michigan Fencing Academy | 1531 | 2500 | 1004.9 | 83% | ||
| Pool | D | 0:5 | GOGOI Kavi | 4 | E25 | 8 | Renaissance Fencing Club | 1106 | 1495 | 445.4 | 68% | ||
| Pool | D | 0:5 | FERENCZ Alexander J. | 8 | E23 | 2 | Renaissance Fencing Club | 1813 | 1050 | 80.6 | 16% | ||
| Pool | D | 3:5 | TAGORE Reyansh | 5 | E24 | 7 | Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy | 1107 | 969 | 171.8 | 43% | ||
| T16 | D | 4:15 | RITTER Nathan E. | 2 | D23 | 4 | Renaissance Fencing Club | 1068 | 2500 | 1230.8 | 92% |