Rio Hotel and Casino - Las Vegas, NV, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WANG Mason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
2 | TIAN Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 33% | |
3 | LEE Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
3 | YOON Ian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 11% | |
5 | FU Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
6 | SUN Jiarui (Jerry) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
7 | LI Vance | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 37% | 9% |
8 | LI Stephen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% |
9 | LIU Yihong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
10 | YOO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% | |
11 | LIN Logan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
12 | ZHANG JENSON | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
13 | BOROVIKOV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
14 | YI Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 34% | |
15 | LEE Daniel | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
16 | MAZAHERI John | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 9% |
17 | LI Kingston | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
18 | YUN Mason | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
19 | CHAUDHARY Oliver | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
20 | KOU Logan | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
21 | REN Mark | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 11% |
22 | NGUYEN Norris | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 17% | |
23 | BUSH Andrew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 9% | |
24 | CHU Clayton | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
25 | MATUSOW Brandon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
26 | TENG Eric | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
27 | WONG Kyle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 21% |
28 | DEMIRCHIAN Edward | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
29 | LEUNG Joon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% | |
30 | LI Ethan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 24% | 3% | |
31 | WANG Alexander | 100% | 93% | 58% | 18% | 2% | - | |
32 | KIM Ian | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
33 | WANG Franklin | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
34 | SHIH Eli | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
35 | WON Jacob | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
36 | SI Alexander | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
37 | HAO hardy | 100% | 82% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
38 | REED Andrew | 100% | 98% | 80% | 41% | 10% | 1% | |
39 | KIM Christian | 100% | 99% | 84% | 45% | 10% | 1% | |
40 | YANG Mikey | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
41 | CHEN Nathan Xingchen | 100% | 98% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
42 | YANG Rony | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
43 | CHI Zachary | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
44 | CAVALLARO Xavier | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
45 | TRIVULCE Ethan | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
46 | LAU Jesse | 100% | 98% | 77% | 34% | 6% | - | |
47 | DAI Greyson | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
48 | LI nathan zeting | 100% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
49 | LEE Paxton | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
50 | LEE Connor | 100% | 85% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
51 | LU Mark | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - |
52 | GAN Samuel | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
52 | ZHANG William | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
54 | ZIMMERMAN Luke | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
55 | LU Jayden | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
56 | LAW Benjamin | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
57 | WAN William | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
58 | SZETO Jonathan | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
58 | KIM Hayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
60 | PEREZ Atticus | 100% | 87% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.